Abortion as empowerment: reproductive rights activism in a legally restricted context

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper analyzes the strategies used by activist health professionals in Argentina who justify providing abortion despite legal restrictions on the procedure. These “insider activists” make a case for abortion rights by linking pregnancy termination to a woman’s ability to exert agency at a key point in her reproductive life, and argue that refusing women access to the procedure constitutes a grievous health risk. This argument frames pregnancy termination as an issue of empowerment and also as a medical necessity.MethodsThis article is based on ethnographic research conducted in Argentina in 2013 and 2015, which includes in-depth interviews with abortion activists and health professionals and ethnographic observation at activist events and in clinics.ResultsDuring the period of my field research, the medical staff in one clinic shifted from abortion counseling, based on a harm reduction model, to legal pregnancy termination, a new mode of abortion provision where they directly provided abortions based on the legal health exception. These insider activists formalized the latter approach by creating a diagnostic instrument that frames women’s “bio-psycho-social” reasons for wishing to terminate a pregnancy as medically justified.ConclusionsThe clinical practice analyzed in this article raises important questions about the potential for health professionals to take on an activist role by making safe abortion accessible, even in a context where the procedure is highly restricted.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1498-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

What has reproductive health decision-making capacity got to do with unintended pregnancy? Evidence from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey

“…Such decisions are essential because sexual interactions often encompass complex, iterative sexual decision-making processes that challenge women to make a multitude of situational appraisals and engage in a variety of sexual behaviors [15]. According to Prata, Tavrow and Upadhyay [16] and McReynolds-Pérez [17], women’s decision making is essential in their reproductive choices because the choices they make on their reproductive health are critical for them to live a better life. Studies have shown that in countries where women have issues with reproductive health decision-making, unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortions are high [18, 19].…”

Self-managed abortion: a constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws?

“…The history of MA shows us how informal networks have discovered, shared and created the space for SMA to flourish, from Brazilian womxn in the 1980s discovering misoprostol as an abortifacient 67 to the Abortion Without Borders coalition in 2020. 20 They have not just enabled the “strategic life choices which are critical for people to live the lives they want” 68 but have created spaces for innovation, hope and joy. It is these actors who have pushed for the shifts we now see in formal service provision, who have paved the way for better quality care and access.…”

From stigma to pride: health professionals and abortion policies in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires

“…Feminism and women’s activism influenced the social arena with their contentious actions, the legal context with their legal activism, and the healthcare facilities’ and providers’ actions with their insider activism. 23 , 24 Their strong collaboration also resulted in the formation of public policies and the drafting of ministry of health guidelines.…”