2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
44
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The six couples who spoke of God's will as a factor in child- Couples acknowledged that the decision to terminate a pregnancy would be difficult but spoke of wanting to prevent suffering, consistent with similar studies (Neter et al 2005;Hans and Kimberly 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The six couples who spoke of God's will as a factor in child- Couples acknowledged that the decision to terminate a pregnancy would be difficult but spoke of wanting to prevent suffering, consistent with similar studies (Neter et al 2005;Hans and Kimberly 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Consistent with framing theory(Iyengar, 1991)(Entman, 1993), the wording of survey questions about abortion attitudes has an important impact on respondents’ answers. Rather than asking whether abortion should be legal in a given context, Hans and Kimberly (2014) asked whether abortion should or should not be an option available to a given woman. They found that respondents’ initial strong views in the absence of details were likely to shift direction upon hearing contextual information that challenged their initial assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have consistently found more support for abortion in cases of a woman’s poor mental or physical health, rape, or fetal anomaly, than in cases of financial hardship, relationship troubles, or other difficult life circumstances. (Gillespie, Ten Vergert, & Kingma, 1988)(Bane et al, 2003)(Cook, Jelen, & Wilcox, 1993) (Smith & Son, 2013) (Hans & Kimberly, 2014) Individual attitudes on abortion are complex and sometimes appear contradictory: e.g., among respondents who say abortion is murder and/or morally wrong, many also say it should be an individual choice left to a woman and her doctor. (Cox et al, 2011) (Moral Issues: Gallup Historical Trends 2014)(Newport & Bird, 2017) Even many Americans who believe that life begins at conception find legal abortion acceptable in many situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accounts from these five women demonstrate the complexity of context and the variability in life circumstances that have been found to be crucial in understanding abortion [20]. They also reveal the different ways that abortion can be given meaning in women’s lives and how that meaning can change over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers noted that it was rare for abortion to be framed as “a positive and legitimate choice” and concluded that the media contribute to the stigmatisation of abortion and the discrediting of women’s reproductive decisions [19]. Public attitudes to abortion are highly contextualised; approval or disapproval depends on what is known of each woman’s circumstances [20]. Discussing abortion detached from its context can, therefore, result in misleading conclusions about public opinion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%