2020
DOI: 10.1177/0141778919894891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abortion Im/mobility: Spatial Consequences in the Republic of Ireland

Abstract: In the context of Ireland’s new legislation governing abortion, I outline and examine the spatial consequences of political decision-making. I argue that Ireland’s new abortion law and its clinical guidance permit travel for some pregnant people but impose fixity on others. I analyse the spatial consequences of legal limitations, including non-medically necessary delays in care and medical control of medication abortions, that necessitate travel for abortion. I demonstrate how current laws fix some pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the practical provision of care, it became more public about the fact that the people to whom they provided care were limited from accessing abortions not just by Irish law but by the financial and logistical burdens of access (a point they also raised in their submission to the Citizens’ Assembly on the repeal of the 8 th Amendment in 2017). While these barriers would be reduced as abortion became available on the island of Ireland, it was clear that many women would still have to travel for services within and perhaps beyond Ireland (see Side, 2020, this issue). Furthermore, although early medical abortion procedures would be free, some abortion seekers without medical cards (including migrants) would have to meet the cost of painkillers and additional medications themselves.…”
Section: Decolonisation After Repealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the practical provision of care, it became more public about the fact that the people to whom they provided care were limited from accessing abortions not just by Irish law but by the financial and logistical burdens of access (a point they also raised in their submission to the Citizens’ Assembly on the repeal of the 8 th Amendment in 2017). While these barriers would be reduced as abortion became available on the island of Ireland, it was clear that many women would still have to travel for services within and perhaps beyond Ireland (see Side, 2020, this issue). Furthermore, although early medical abortion procedures would be free, some abortion seekers without medical cards (including migrants) would have to meet the cost of painkillers and additional medications themselves.…”
Section: Decolonisation After Repealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That victory was, of course, only partial. The mindsets that the 8 th Amendment had inculcated are hard to shift and the new law, the Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018, which finally passed in December 2018 and came into force in January 2019, is deeply problematic in ways documented throughout this issue (de Londras, 2020; Side, 2020) and elsewhere (MERJ, 2019). The bruises of the campaign itself also remain, especially for those who were marginalised within an official campaign that apprehended loss and thus focused on the so-called middle ground.…”
Section: The Referendum and The New Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The campaign too largely ignored the difficulties of access to abortion for people of colour, migrants with precarious legal status in Ireland, trans people, young people, people in abusive and controlling relationships (MERJ, 2019). These are the same people who continue to feel the sharpest edges of the restrictions of Irish law, too often left behind by the new legislation, still relying on travel, self-managed abortion and the mutual aid of feminist activism to escape from undesired pregnancy (MERJ, 2019; de Londras, 2020, this issue; Duffy, 2020, this issue; Side, 2020, this issue). Migrant and trans reproductive rights activists in particular continue to make (righteous) demands for atonement from the official campaign, and much work remains to be done (de Londras, forthcoming).…”
Section: The Referendum and The New Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those who cannot afford this or are migrants or asylum seekers-requiring additional visas or have travel restrictions, navigate additional barriers in order to access care. Despite legalisation of abortion in Ireland, some women still continue to travel for abortion care [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%