2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00031-005-1009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About Knop's Action of the Weyl Group on the Set of Orbits of a Spherical Subgroup in the Flag Manifold

Abstract: Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group defined on an algebraically closed field k of characteristic different from 2. Let B denote the flag variety of G. Let H be a spherical subgroup of G. F. Knop defined an action of the Weyl group W of G on the finite set of the H-orbits in B. Here, we define an invariant, namely the type, separating the orbits of W .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knop in [91] defines an action of the Weyl group W of G on B(X) and recovers the little Weyl group (see Subsection 3.4.1) as a subgroup of the stabiliser in W of X seen as an element of B(X). N. Ressayre gives in [131] invariants characterising the orbits of the Weyl group action on Γ(X). In [132] he gives a classification and several equivalent definitions of the spherical varieties for which W acts transitively on the B-orbits within the same G-orbit.…”
Section: Smoothness Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knop in [91] defines an action of the Weyl group W of G on B(X) and recovers the little Weyl group (see Subsection 3.4.1) as a subgroup of the stabiliser in W of X seen as an element of B(X). N. Ressayre gives in [131] invariants characterising the orbits of the Weyl group action on Γ(X). In [132] he gives a classification and several equivalent definitions of the spherical varieties for which W acts transitively on the B-orbits within the same G-orbit.…”
Section: Smoothness Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. As a consequence of the main theorem in [30], D δ(Ψ Φ + (w)) ⊂ δ(Ψ ∩ Φ + (w)) and the latter has cardinality at most l(w), therefore |D M| = l(w) if and only if Φ + (w) ⊂ Ψ and D δ(Ψ Φ + (w)) = δ(Φ + (w)) has cardinality l(w). Assuming ii), the claim follows by noticing that the equality D δ(Ψ Φ + (w)) = δ(Φ + (w)) is equivalent to iii), whereas the equality |δ(Φ + (w))| = l(w) is equivalent to iv).…”
Section: Combinatorial Parameters For the Orbits Of B On G/hmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Proof. As a consequence of the main theorem in [30], every closed B-orbit has minimal rank. Therefore every closed B-orbit in G/H is of the shape O w,∅ for some w ∈ W .…”
Section: Combinatorial Parameters For the Orbits Of B On G/hmentioning
confidence: 89%