2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00526-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
238
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 606 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
18
238
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the observations made in previous studies (e.g. [5,9]), such an increase is found to be attributable to the increase in the confining stress, due primarily to the lateral inertia, combined with the pressure sensitive feature of the material strength. That is to say, the dynamic structural effect plays a dominant role in the apparent strength increase of the sample in compression.…”
Section: Compression Simulationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to the observations made in previous studies (e.g. [5,9]), such an increase is found to be attributable to the increase in the confining stress, due primarily to the lateral inertia, combined with the pressure sensitive feature of the material strength. That is to say, the dynamic structural effect plays a dominant role in the apparent strength increase of the sample in compression.…”
Section: Compression Simulationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…[3][4][5][6]), without always observing a strain rate limit that is associated with guaranteeing stress uniformity. Among other factors, this is believed to have contributed, to a varying extent, to the large scatter in the observed dynamic strength increase factor (DIF) for compressive as well as tensile strengths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10,11]). More recent numerical studies using 2D mesoscale models provide further support to this argument (e.g.…”
Section: Dynamic Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of friction on the dynamic response in SHPB tests is well-known, which leads to errors in the DIF [4,25,26], particularly in concrete-like materials due to their coarser surface when compared to metals [27] and therefore friction should not be completely neglected even though lubricants are used. Figure 3(a) shows the results of the effect of the friction coefficient µ on the dynamic response of mortar for various β and ψ.…”
Section: -P4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of the compressive strength in dynamic testing is commonly described by using the dynamic increase factor (DIF), which is defined by the ratio of the dynamic strength to the quasi-static strength in unconfined uniaxial compression [4]. The DIF of concrete-like materials in the high strain-rate range of 10 1 -10 3 s −1 is often obtained by performing dynamic test using a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB); however, it has long been debated whether the increase of compressive strength observed in SHPB tests of unconfined specimens is an intrinsic material property or is related to structural or inertial effects [4][5][6]. It has been shown that the induced lateral confinement in SHPB test, which causes increase of DIF, may be caused by friction between the bars and the specimen [5,7], large specimen diameters [8,9], and radial inertia [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%