2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00006-010-0213-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About the Structure of Meson Algebras

Abstract: We have found an easier and more effective method to describe the structure of meson algebras (also called Duffin-Kemmer algebras) by paying due respect to interior multiplications, to parity gradings and to the quadratic algebra Ω associated with the bilinear form under consideration. Some applications follow, in particular in the context of the meson wave equation, and in the treatment of orthogonal transformations (as restrictions of twisted inner automorphisms). Neutral meson algebras and mesonic interior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it is important to emphasize that the DKP field is often employed in nuclear physics to describe mesons [21], when it is possible to say that it has a mesonic algebraic structure [67]. But the DKP fields are described by the DKP algebra, while the fermionic field obeys a Clifford algebra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is important to emphasize that the DKP field is often employed in nuclear physics to describe mesons [21], when it is possible to say that it has a mesonic algebraic structure [67]. But the DKP fields are described by the DKP algebra, while the fermionic field obeys a Clifford algebra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and the identity (1.10) is a consequence of M (3) =0 in A (1) , but requires some manipulation of the decomposed identity map for 3-adic tensors to prove. Larger Clifford and Kemmer algebras which contain their {S a } counterparts are definable on the physical three-space [14,35,36] using modified identities (1.9) and (1.10), however it is unclear if any instructive comparisons can be made between them and the spin algebras.…”
Section: Mathematical Comparison With Other Non-relativistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If Z denotes the orbit of x in the retraction of A, then I Z (A/Rad(A)) is non-commutative, which shows that a single retraction in Proposition 10 does not suffice. Note that in constrast to the exterior algebra (V ), it is not enough to assume the relation bab = 0 for the elements of the subspace V := F 2 x ⊕ F 2 y of A, which would lead to the meson algebra B(V ), an algebra [20,24,26] with an additional basis element x 2 y 2 . In A, this element vanishes since (x + y)x(x + y)y = 0.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%