2001
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-31-5-739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Above- and below-ground effects of aspen clonal regeneration and succession to conifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor regeneration of aspen has been associated with conifer succession or conversion to shrubs and grasses (Schier et al, 1985;Shepperd et al, 2001). Aspen cover may be lost on some sites if most of the overstory is dead, root systems are in poor condition, and little regeneration is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poor regeneration of aspen has been associated with conifer succession or conversion to shrubs and grasses (Schier et al, 1985;Shepperd et al, 2001). Aspen cover may be lost on some sites if most of the overstory is dead, root systems are in poor condition, and little regeneration is present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root systems regressed in deteriorating stands, surviving primarily near the residual live stems (Schier, 1975). In southern Utah, deteriorating aspen stands had lower root densities than adjoining healthy stands (Shepperd et al, 2001), and suckering was suppressed by apical dominance of residual stems over the smaller root systems (Schier, 1975;Schier and Campbell, 1980). As in the Great Lakes region, observations suggested that genotype was an important factor determining which clones deteriorated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a century of stand establishment conifer height growth will equal or exceed that of aspen. The current shift in conifer dominance in mixed stands is likely to be the result of this change in competitive superiority from aspen to conifer stems (McKenzie, 2001;Shepperd et al, 2001;Kaye, 2002). Since the last major fire events on the Plateau were recorded in 1879, the shifts in dominance measured 100 years later appear to be consistent with natural historic variation in vegetation cover for aspen forests in the western Rocky Mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of more recent successful establishment of aspen followed the severe fires in Yellowstone National Park in 1988, which apparently provided a Bwindow of opportunity^of suitable substrate and climate conditions for seed germination (Romme et al 2005). Although aspen clones are long lived, possibly thousands of years (Kemperman and Barnes 1976), individual stems normally live 100-150 years (Mitton and Grant 1996;Shepperd et al 2001). Since sexual regeneration requires prolonged moist conditions and is thought to be rare for xeric aspen, it is possible that an aspen clone lost from the landscape will not regenerate from seed (Mitton and Grant 1996).…”
Section: Aspen Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stable aspen systems are unsuitable for conifers or are located far away from conifer seed sources (Mueggler 1989). In biophysical settings where aspen is seral to conifer species, slowgrowing shade-tolerant conifers begin to overtop aspen late in succession, eventually outcompeting the aspen, leading to aspen loss (Shepperd et al 2001).…”
Section: Aspen Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%