2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Above-ground productivity and litter decomposition in a tidal freshwater forested wetland on Bull Island, SC, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Decomposition rate of mixed leaf litter of C. lanceolata and M. macclurei was slightly, but not significantly, faster in mixed stand than pure stand. This result is in agreement with the observations of Pandey et al (2007) who found that decomposition rate of Quercus leaf litter was slightly faster at the mixed forest than pure plantation site at the later stage of litter decomposition and Ozalp et al (2007) who reported that water tupelo leaves on the Big and Little Bull Creeks side decomposed faster than on the Pee Dee River side probably due to microenvironmental factors such as temperature and moisture availability. Difference in decomposition rate between both stands may be primarily due to the difference in site fertility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Decomposition rate of mixed leaf litter of C. lanceolata and M. macclurei was slightly, but not significantly, faster in mixed stand than pure stand. This result is in agreement with the observations of Pandey et al (2007) who found that decomposition rate of Quercus leaf litter was slightly faster at the mixed forest than pure plantation site at the later stage of litter decomposition and Ozalp et al (2007) who reported that water tupelo leaves on the Big and Little Bull Creeks side decomposed faster than on the Pee Dee River side probably due to microenvironmental factors such as temperature and moisture availability. Difference in decomposition rate between both stands may be primarily due to the difference in site fertility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While R h was modest (but comparable to other systems; Berbigier et al, 2001;Gough et al, 2008), and the litter inputs (Table 1) were in the middle of the 313-680 g m À2 yr À1 range reported for a number of coastal SE US forests (Megonigal et al, 1997;Ozalp et al, 2007 and references therein), litter inputs were 37% (2005), 5% (2006) and 9% (2007) lower than R h . Given that the R h estimate is a conservative one (0.5 Â SR), it is unlikely that the estimated soil C loss is exaggerated.…”
Section: Soil C Balancesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…the range of 477-1117 g C m À2 yr À1 (Megonigal et al, 1997;Ozalp et al, 2007). It is important to note that in terms of hydrologic regime and average groundwater depth, the current site falls on the dry end of the range of floodplain forests characterized by Megonigal et al (1997).…”
Section: Productivity and Sources Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Variation in extent and duration of flooding has been shown to strongly influence decomposition and nutrient release by altering moisture, temperature, and the amount of aerobic vs. anaerobic respiration occurring (Shure et al 1986, Stoeckel and Miller-Goodman 2001, Ozalp et al 2007). Additionally, differences in hydrological regimes between hummocks and hollows may influence rates of decomposition by altering decomposer communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%