2020
DOI: 10.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.6.10011012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground biomass basic density of hardwoods tree species.

Abstract: The influence of tree species on basic density of wood, bark and small-wood was investigated here. Experimental material was obtained from 73 trees of 7 tree species, namely alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), birch (Betula pendula Roth.), hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.), Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), Sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and Turkey oak (Quercus cerris L.) from the territory of Slovakia. Wood and bark samples were taken from discs cut from three tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dibdiakova and Vadla (2012), who studied the density of P. abies bark, also found it denser than density of the stem wood regardless of the height in the tree. The same result was reported by Petráš et al (2019) for P. abies and other species.…”
Section: Difference Of Bd Between Tree Componentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Dibdiakova and Vadla (2012), who studied the density of P. abies bark, also found it denser than density of the stem wood regardless of the height in the tree. The same result was reported by Petráš et al (2019) for P. abies and other species.…”
Section: Difference Of Bd Between Tree Componentssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The energy stored in the above-ground biomass of the mean trees of the studied coniferous species was calculated on the basis of the measured calorific values, tables of model volumes of trees [22], as well as the model density values for bark, wood, and small-wood [31]. Mathematical models of classical tree volume tables show the volume of whole trees v (m 3 ) in relation to their diameters DBH (cm), heights h (m) and main components (round-wood with or without bark, bark, and small-wood).…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where: CH(DBH, h)-the energy reserve of the tree (GJ tree −1 ); v i -the volume of i-th fraction (stem wood, stem bark, small-wood) taken over from the volume tables [22] (m 3 ); ρ i -basic density of the i-th fraction taken from [31] (kg m −3 ); CH i -the calorific value of the i-th fraction (MJ kg −1 ); m 0 -the dry matter weight of the twigs and needles taken from [32] (kg); CH twne -the calorific value of the twigs and needles (MJ kg −1 ). The dry weight of the above-ground biomass of the model trees at different stages of their development was calculated using equation (1), from which the items CH i and CH twne representing the combustion heat were omitted.…”
Section: Calculation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waste generated by the forestry and forest products sector, such as pine bark and pinecones, poses significant challenges for the logging, lumbering, and construction industries. The density of pine bark is approximately 333 kg/m 3 [65]. With a thermal conductivity of 0.128 W/m•K, Calabrian pine bark demonstrates excellent thermal insulation properties when used in composites [66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%