2012
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.6.063588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground biomass estimation of tropical forest from Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar data using modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model with fused-image band-8 input has the highest prediction accuracy (R 2 = 0.79, RMSE = 22.82 g m −2 ), which is more accurate in biomass prediction with less uncertainty in an area with a low vegetation cover. This can be ascribed to the ability of that model to accurately detect nonvegetated areas (which are smooth for radar waves) and with a low backscatter coefficient compared to the vegetated areas [48]. The Sentinel-1 C-band SAR is the preferred dataset for biomass analysis in low-biomass sites such as grasslands and forest regeneration sites.…”
Section: The Accuracy and Uncertainty Of The Agb Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model with fused-image band-8 input has the highest prediction accuracy (R 2 = 0.79, RMSE = 22.82 g m −2 ), which is more accurate in biomass prediction with less uncertainty in an area with a low vegetation cover. This can be ascribed to the ability of that model to accurately detect nonvegetated areas (which are smooth for radar waves) and with a low backscatter coefficient compared to the vegetated areas [48]. The Sentinel-1 C-band SAR is the preferred dataset for biomass analysis in low-biomass sites such as grasslands and forest regeneration sites.…”
Section: The Accuracy and Uncertainty Of The Agb Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest vertical structure is regarded as the major element for forest biomass assessment. Various SAR processing techniques have been widely exploited and implemented to retrieve forest height 3 and its biomass 4,5 . InSAR (SAR Interferometry) takes into account the phase difference between the two SAR images which estimate the average height of all backscattering contribution and hence does not serve the purpose 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies for AGB and stem volume retrieval from SAR-backscatter-based WCM used single-polarized or dual-polarized data to retrieve the backscatter contribution of forest vegetation and the ground surface as model parameters [25,34,35]. Estimation of backscatter contribution due to forest vegetation and the ground surface was mathematically rigorous and less reliable due to the use of single or dual-pol SAR data [36][37][38][39]. The measurement of model parameters has shown dependency on field-measured data to get a reliable output through a modeling approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%