2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aboveground Whitefly Infestation-Mediated Reshaping of the Root Microbiota

Abstract: Plants respond to various types of herbivore and pathogen attack using well-developed defensive machinery designed for self-protection. Infestation from phloem-sucking insects such as whitefly and aphid on plant leaves was previously shown to influence both the saprophytic and pathogenic bacterial community in the plant rhizosphere. However, the modulation of the root microbial community by plants following insect infestation has been largely unexplored. Only limited studies of culture-dependent bacterial dive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
71
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Plants control their rhizosphere microbiome through root exudates (34,107,119), which change the chemical composition of the rhizosphere to attract and support beneficial microbes, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizal fungi (Figure 5) (59,129). Pests and diseases are known to alter root exudation composition, which can result in changes in soil-and root-associated microbiomes (11,46,68). Although the exact mechanisms driving these stress-induced changes remain unclear, key defense signaling chemicals, including SA, JA, and benzoxaxinoids, have been shown to influence microbial communities in the rhizosphere (26,58,73).…”
Section: Shaping the Plant-associated Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants control their rhizosphere microbiome through root exudates (34,107,119), which change the chemical composition of the rhizosphere to attract and support beneficial microbes, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizal fungi (Figure 5) (59,129). Pests and diseases are known to alter root exudation composition, which can result in changes in soil-and root-associated microbiomes (11,46,68). Although the exact mechanisms driving these stress-induced changes remain unclear, key defense signaling chemicals, including SA, JA, and benzoxaxinoids, have been shown to influence microbial communities in the rhizosphere (26,58,73).…”
Section: Shaping the Plant-associated Microbiomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of root exudates increases in response to herbivore and pathogen attack of aboveground (systemic) plant parts, suggesting that plants utilize an aggressive strategy to recruit beneficial soil microbes for the protection of distal plant parts (Tkacz et al, 2015;Kong et al, 2016;Berendsen et al, 2018). Collectively, saprophytic microbes recruited by plant pathogens and herbivore-infected plants may promote plant innate immunity.…”
Section: Puzzle Pieces Of Misimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants respond to various biotic and abiotic stresses using well-developed defence mechanisms. Under stress conditions, plants also benefit from interactions with quickresponding soil microbes (Berendsen et al, 2012;Kong et al, 2016;Pineda et al, 2017;Santos-Medillin et al, 2017). Survival of plants in the natural environment depends on their interaction with a complex and dynamic community of microbes.…”
Section: Plant Recognition and Microbiota Reshapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Defence responses occur not only locally, but throughout the plant. Although most studies on systemic responses focus on above ground tissues, in response to induction in either another leaf or in the roots (Papadopoulou & van Dam, ; Soler et al, ), there is an increasing body of literature showing that roots respond to leaf herbivory as well (Gulati, Baldwin, & Gaquerel, ; Huang, Siemann, Xiao, Yang, & Ding, ; Kim, Song, & Ryu, ; Kong, Kim, Song, Lee, & Ryu, ; Machado et al, ; Machado, Arce, McClure, Baldwin, & Erb, ; Soler, Erb, & Kaplan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%