2019
DOI: 10.1080/00319104.2019.1698044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abraham model correlations for describing dissolution of organic solutes and inorganic gases in dimethyl carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be seen in Figure 4 for 1-chloroanthraquinone, phenothiazine, benzoin, and 4-nitrobenzoic acid. The experimental data for those solutes originate from the publications by Dai et al, 32 Flanagan et al, 33 Grubbs et al, 34 Hoover et al, 35,36 Saifullah et al, 37 Stephens et al, 38 Strickland et al, 39 Yang et al, 40 and Zhu et al 41 In the Supporting Information (Figure S6), the same analysis is made for the 40 solutes that are most common in the database at 298 K. As can be seen in Figure 4 (blue), the solid solubility of some solutes is predicted very well, while a constant deviation from the parity line is observed for others. In the latter case, the absolute value of the predicted solid solubility is off, but the relative solid solubility between various organic solvents is well captured by the model.…”
Section: S Dtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be seen in Figure 4 for 1-chloroanthraquinone, phenothiazine, benzoin, and 4-nitrobenzoic acid. The experimental data for those solutes originate from the publications by Dai et al, 32 Flanagan et al, 33 Grubbs et al, 34 Hoover et al, 35,36 Saifullah et al, 37 Stephens et al, 38 Strickland et al, 39 Yang et al, 40 and Zhu et al 41 In the Supporting Information (Figure S6), the same analysis is made for the 40 solutes that are most common in the database at 298 K. As can be seen in Figure 4 (blue), the solid solubility of some solutes is predicted very well, while a constant deviation from the parity line is observed for others. In the latter case, the absolute value of the predicted solid solubility is off, but the relative solid solubility between various organic solvents is well captured by the model.…”
Section: S Dtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is demonstrated in Figure 6 for nacetylglycine, benzoin, bezafibrate, and chlorpropamide. The experimental data for these solvents originate from the publications by Dai et al, 32 Guo et al, 42 Guo et al, 43 Liu et al, 44 Liu et al, 45 Stephens et al, 38 Strickland et al, 39 Yang et al, 46 Yang et al, 40 and Zhu et al 41 For the 40 most common solutes in the CombiSolu-Exp database, the same analysis is added to the Supporting Information (Figure S10). Replacing log(S aq,model,298 K ) with experimental data log(S EtOH,exp,298 K ) for the calculation of log(S X,298 K ) shifts the prediction results to the parity line, which is in line with the results for log(S X,298 K ).…”
Section: S Dtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen in Figure 4 for 1-chloroanthraquinone, phenothiazine, benzoin, and 4-nitrobenzoic acid. The experimental data for those solutes originate from the publications by Dai et al, 32 Flanagan et al, 33 Grubbs et al, 34 Hoover et al, 35,36 Saifullah et al, 37 Stephens et al, 38 Strickland et al, 39 Yang et al, 40 and Zhu et al 41 In the supporting information (Figure S6), the same analysis is made for the 40 solutes that are most common in the database at 298K. As can be seen in Figure 4 (blue), the solid solubility of some solutes is predicted very well, whilst a constant deviation from the parity line is observed for others.…”
Section: Aqueous Solid Solubility At 298kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is demonstrated in Figure 6 for n-acetylglycine, benzoin, bezafibrate, and chlorpropamide. The experimental data for these solvents originate from the publications by Dai et al, 32 Guo et al, 42 Guo et al, 43 Liu et al, 44 Liu et al, 45 Stephens et al, 38 Strickland et al, 39 Yang et al, 46 Yang et al, 40 and Zhu et al 41 For the 40 most common solutes in the CombiSolu-Exp database, the same analysis is added to the supporting information (Figure S10). Replacing log(S aq,model,298K ) with experimental data log(S EtOH,exp,298K ) for the calculation of log(S X,298K ) shifts the prediction results to the parity line, which is in line with the results for log(S X,298K ).…”
Section: Predicting Temperature-dependent Solid Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent efforts pertaining to solubility have focused on experimental measurements for crystalline nonelectrolyte solutes dissolved in select organic mono-solvents [14][15][16][17] and in binary aqueous-organic solvent mixtures [18][19][20][21][22]. The measured solubility data has been used in the calculation of the Abraham model solute descriptors [14][15][16][17] and in developing the Abraham model correlations for predicting the solubilities of pharmaceutical compounds in organic solvents used in recrystallization purifications and in co-solvency solubility enhancements [23][24][25][26][27]. Transcutol was one the recent organic solvents for which the predictive Abraham model expressions were reported [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%