2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01278-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of detrusor muscle in TUR-BT specimen – can we predict who is at highest risk?

Yannic Volz,
Rabea Trappmann,
Benedikt Ebner
et al.

Abstract: Introduction As a high-quality TUR-BT is important to ensure adequate treatment for bladder cancer patients, the aim of the current study is to investigate the impact of patient-related, surgical and tumor-specific parameters on detrusor muscle (DM) absence (primary objective) and to assess the impact of DM on the prognosis after a TUR-BT (secondary objective). Patients and methods Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TUR-BTs) between 2009 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter may be explained by the additional resections or biopsies from PDD-positive areas of the urinary bladder [ 15 ]. Still, it should be noted that the overall rates of complications were lower than other relevant studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Considering that the incidence of major complications in the present study were relatively low, the statistically significant differences between both groups, may not be of clinical importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The latter may be explained by the additional resections or biopsies from PDD-positive areas of the urinary bladder [ 15 ]. Still, it should be noted that the overall rates of complications were lower than other relevant studies [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Considering that the incidence of major complications in the present study were relatively low, the statistically significant differences between both groups, may not be of clinical importance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%