2015
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.6567.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of kdr resistance alleles in the Union of the Comoros, East Africa

Abstract: Knockdown resistance ( kdr) and CYP9K1 genotypes were detected by a MOLDI-TOF based SNP genotyping assay (Sequenom iPLEX) in samples of Anopheles gambiae collected at 13 sites throughout the Union of the Comoros and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania during February and March 2011. All A. gambiae specimens collected in the Comoros were homozygous for the susceptible kdr alleles (+/+) while 96% of A. gambiae from Dar es Salaam were homozygous for the East African kdr resistant genotype (E/E). In contrast, all specimens fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…coluzzii sample with more than two gambiae-specific markers is considered “introgressed”. This is consistent with previous studies [11, 14]. The L1014F mutation was not considered a species-specific marker.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…coluzzii sample with more than two gambiae-specific markers is considered “introgressed”. This is consistent with previous studies [11, 14]. The L1014F mutation was not considered a species-specific marker.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…DNA was extracted from head/thorax tissue using the QIAGEN Biosprint 96 system with QIAGEN blood tissue reagents following established protocols [12, 13]. A modified version of the “Divergence Island SNP” (DIS) assay [11, 14] was used to distinguish An. gambiae , An.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of doubt in the morphological identifications, pinned specimens were compared with specimens in the reference collections of the South African National Institute for Communicable Diseases. For members of the Anopheles gambiae complex and Anopheles funestus group, laboratory PCR identifications were done on individually-tubed specimens preserved in tubes containing silica gel ( funestus group) or 80% ethanol ( gambiae complex) following protocols in [ 74 76 ], respectively. Anopheles funestus group members from Moremi and Khwai were not identified to group member because the DNA of these specimens was too degraded for preservation by the time we got back to the base camp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted from individual mosquito whole bodies using the QIAGEN Biosprint 96 system and QIAGEN blood tissue kit and protocols described in Nieman, Yamasaki, Collier, and Lee () and Yamasaki et al (). We used the “Divergence Island SNP” (DIS) assay (Lee, Marsden, Nieman, & Lanzaro, ) to genotype A. coluzzii , A. gambiae , F1 hybrids and early and late backcrosses as described in Lee, Marsden, et al () and Lee et al (). The DIS assay contains 14 species‐specific SNP markers that include 5 SNPs on the X chromosome, 5 on the 2L chromosome and 4 on the 3L chromosome (Lee et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%