2010
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of nonlinear responses in cells and tissues exposed to RF energy at mobile phone frequencies using a doubly resonant cavity

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This low-pass behaviour is consistent with recent experimental findings indicating the absence of harmonic cell response to EM carriers in the mobile-telephone frequency bands [41,42], and the presence of such responses to (very) low frequency fields [43,44].…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This low-pass behaviour is consistent with recent experimental findings indicating the absence of harmonic cell response to EM carriers in the mobile-telephone frequency bands [41,42], and the presence of such responses to (very) low frequency fields [43,44].…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As discussed by Foster and Repacholi [2004], there is no plausible, generally accepted mechanism for modulation-specific effects at realistic electromagnetic field intensities, and recent findings indicate that demodulation of RF energy (which would increase the plausibility of modulationdependent effects) does not occur in living cells or tissues [Kowalczuk et al, 2010]. The experimental evidence is strongest for effects on the central nervous system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly animal studies failed also to provide any consistent evidence for the cancer promoting effects of RF radiation (Gurbuz et al, 2010;Kowalczuk et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2010). Epidemiological studies also failed to clearly and consistently prove an excess cancer or tumor risk (in terms of odds ratios) for cell phone users.…”
Section: Mobile Phone Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%