2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2011.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence of porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) and high prevalence of PCV 2 exposure and infection in swine finisher herds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the PCVD epizootic, elevated virus infection pressure led to the more frequent activation of PCV2-specific plasma B cells; this phenomenon was reflected by a higher prevalence and higher average concentrations of PCV2-specific IgG antibodies than in the other investigated time periods. A previous investigation similar to this study reported the reverse correlation; in particular, a 22-fold median decrease in virus concentration resulted in a decrease from 78.8% to 19% in the proportion of pigs positive for PCV2-specific antibodies [20]. This prior finding supports our observation of a decrease in PCV2-specific IgG antibodies from the epizootic period to the post-epizootic period.…”
Section: Short Communicationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the PCVD epizootic, elevated virus infection pressure led to the more frequent activation of PCV2-specific plasma B cells; this phenomenon was reflected by a higher prevalence and higher average concentrations of PCV2-specific IgG antibodies than in the other investigated time periods. A previous investigation similar to this study reported the reverse correlation; in particular, a 22-fold median decrease in virus concentration resulted in a decrease from 78.8% to 19% in the proportion of pigs positive for PCV2-specific antibodies [20]. This prior finding supports our observation of a decrease in PCV2-specific IgG antibodies from the epizootic period to the post-epizootic period.…”
Section: Short Communicationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This may explain why the positive rate obtained by IIF was higher than that obtained by the ELISAs with the Cap protein as a coating antigen and may explain why such ELISAs have higher specificity than IIF for PCV2 antibody detection. Despite previous studies describing the high prevalence of PCV1 in swine herds, recent investigations have shown that the prevalence of PCV1 is low in PCV field cases, with PCV2 being the prevailing strain (32). This may explain why the incidence of PCV2 as measured by IIF was in good agreement but slightly higher than with the ELISAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Neutralizing antibody titers against PCV2 were tested with a serum virus neutralization assay (SVN) using serum samples collected at 28,35,42,49, and 56 dpi, essentially as For testing the neutralizing antibody titers against PRRSV, a SVN test was conducted as previously described (Zhou et al, 2012). Briefly, two-fold diluted serum samples collected at 28,35,42,49, and 56 dpi from each pig were mixed with an equal volume of PRRSV VR2385 virus at an infectious titer of 2 × 10 3 TCID50/mL and incubated at 37C for 1 h. The mixtures were then dispensed into MARC-145 cells in 96-well plates and incubated for 1 h at 37 C.…”
Section: Detection Of Neutralizing Activity Against Pcv2 and Prrsv Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, two-fold diluted serum samples collected at 28,35,42,49, and 56 dpi from each pig were mixed with an equal volume of PRRSV VR2385 virus at an infectious titer of 2 × 10 3 TCID50/mL and incubated at 37C for 1 h. The mixtures were then dispensed into MARC-145 cells in 96-well plates and incubated for 1 h at 37 C. After washing with PBS, the cells were maintained in DMEM with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS).…”
Section: Detection Of Neutralizing Activity Against Pcv2 and Prrsv Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation