Absence of Within‐Colony Kin Discrimination in a Multiple‐Queen Ant, Leptothorax acervorum

Abstract

Inclusive fitness theory predicts that, other things equal, individuals within social groups should direct altruistic behaviour towards their most highly related group‐mates to maximise indirect fitness benefits. In the social insects, most previous studies have shown that within‐colony kin discrimination (nepotism) is absent or weak. However, the number of studies that have investigated within‐colony kin discrimination at the level of individual behaviour remains relatively small. We tested for within‐colony kin discrimination in the facultatively multiple‐queen (polygynous) ant, Leptothorax acervorum. Specifically, we tested whether workers within polygynous colonies treated queens differently as a function of their relatedness to them. Colonies containing two egg‐laying queens were filmed to measure the rate at which individually marked workers antennated and groomed or fed each queen. Relatedness between individual queens and workers was calculated from their genotypes at four microsatellite loci. The results showed there were no differences in the rates at which workers antennated or groomed/fed their more related queen and their less related queen. Workers interacted preferentially with their potential mother queen with respect to grooming/feeding but not with respect to antennation. However, because of high queen turnover, the frequency of adult workers with their potential mother queen still present within the colony was relatively low. Overall, therefore, we found no evidence for within‐colony kin discrimination in the context of the average worker's treatment of queens in polygynous L. acervorum colonies.

Discrimination of non-nestmate early brood in ants: behavioural and chemical analyses

“…As such, our experimental set-up would then have induced a higher non-nestmate brood retrieval, without masking the difference in behaviour between host and non-host species. As observed here in the case non-host ant species, there are other species of ants and social insects in general, that do not discriminate against non-nestmates, or non-kin, even though theory would predict them to do so (Blatrix & Jaisson, 2002; de Gasperin et al, 2021; Friend & Bourke, 2012; Helanterä et al, 2007; Kikuchi et al, 2007; Mora-Kepfer, 2014). Outside social insects, bird or mammals can either be kin-discriminative or not in their altruistic behaviour depending on the species.…”

How cooperatively breeding birds identify relatives and avoid incest: New insights into dispersal and kin recognition

“…Johnstone's [64] evolutionarily stable strategy model, which considered the fitness perspectives of both parents and offspring, predicted the opposite relationship between promiscuity and recognition cues but still found that concealment of genetic identity should be favored over a wide range of conditions. These models have recently received some empirical support in social insects [65,66], but deserve more rigorous testing in a wider range of cooperative animals, including birds.…”

Nestmate Recognition in Eusocial Insects: The Honeybee as a Model System

“…Several studies of ants have noted an absence of nepotistic behavior within colonies (Zinck et al 2009;Kellner and Heinze 2011;Friend and Bourke 2012). In eusocial wasps the chemical information necessary for discrimations that would support nepotism is available, at least in some species (Dani et al 2004) and data suggests that this information can be used in Polistes dominulus (Leadbeater et al 2014).…”