2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.087001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, we have experimentally demonstrated through heat transport measurements that a Josephson junction acts as an inductor even in the presence of a highly resistive environment. Though the interpretation of the dissipative transition can be debated 23 , 26 , the discrepancy between the heat transport measurements and the control charge transport measurements by us here and in previous works 13 , 20 , 42 , cannot be accounted for by the existing theory and calls for further developments, both experimental and theoretical. Our findings are important not only from the fundamental physics point of view but also for future applications such as microbolometers or heat sink designs in quantum circuits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, we have experimentally demonstrated through heat transport measurements that a Josephson junction acts as an inductor even in the presence of a highly resistive environment. Though the interpretation of the dissipative transition can be debated 23 , 26 , the discrepancy between the heat transport measurements and the control charge transport measurements by us here and in previous works 13 , 20 , 42 , cannot be accounted for by the existing theory and calls for further developments, both experimental and theoretical. Our findings are important not only from the fundamental physics point of view but also for future applications such as microbolometers or heat sink designs in quantum circuits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In electrical terms, this translates to an effective phase-dependent Josephson inductance in parallel with a capacitance (see Fig. 4 c), where is an average over phase fluctuations 26 , 38 . Within this linear model, and by assuming the lumped approximation (valid since the dominant radiation wavelength λ th = h c / k B T ~ 10 cm at 150 mK is much larger than the circuit characteristic dimensions ~50 μm), the power transmission coefficient can be explicitly written 3 , 9 as τ ( ω , Φ) = 4 R S R D /∣ Z T ( ω , Φ)∣ 2 (see “Methods”), with Z T ( ω , Φ) the frequency-dependent total series impedance of the circuit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 some tentative arguments are presented, as to why the observed absence of the transition in Josephson junctions could be related to whether the normal metal bath preserves or violates phase compactness. We note that this work was not received without controversy 27,28 , and has spurred a number of follow-up works with differing results, both on the theoretical 77 and the experimental 78 side. At any rate, we expect (ii) to be important to limit the allowed forms of a generic inductive coupling to an environment for circuits involving QPS junctions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a consequence, we suggest that the performance of some high-impedance quantum devices 18 , 19 , 31 is actually improved by thermal fluctuations. It is also interesting to consider whether experimental studies of insulating behaviour in resistively shunted Josephson junctions 32 35 could be understood by carefully considering the role of non-zero temperature, finite-size or non-perturbative effects 36 .…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%