2009
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/42/4/044009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute angle-differential cross sections for electron-impact excitation of neon within the first 3.5 eV above threshold

Abstract: Absolute angle-differential cross sections for excitation of neon atoms to the four 2p 5 3s and to selected 2p 5 3p levels have been determined as a function of electron energy up to 3.5 eV above threshold at the scattering angles of 0• , 45• and 180• . In addition, the cross sections were recorded as function of scattering angle from 0• to 180• at 18 eV for the 2p 5 3s levels and at 19.3 eV for the 2p 5 3p levels, respectively. The cross sections were also determined theoretically using the Breit-Pauli B-spli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted resonance structure was subsequently confirmed experimentally [13]. Very good agreement at low energies was also achieved for the energy-dependent differential cross sections for excitation of the 2p 5 3s and 2p 5 3p states [14,15]. The key feature of the BSR method and the published suite of computer codes [16] is the possibility to employ nonorthogonal sets of term-dependent oneelectron orbitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted resonance structure was subsequently confirmed experimentally [13]. Very good agreement at low energies was also achieved for the energy-dependent differential cross sections for excitation of the 2p 5 3s and 2p 5 3p states [14,15]. The key feature of the BSR method and the published suite of computer codes [16] is the possibility to employ nonorthogonal sets of term-dependent oneelectron orbitals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Despite the fact that the previous BSR calculations [12][13][14][15] very accurately reproduced the low-energy near-threshold resonance structure, they did not account for coupling to the target continuum. Consequently, they cannot be considered fully converged regarding, for example, the absolute values of the excitation cross sections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As two representatives of work in this area, we mention here the papers by Zeman et al [21] and by Grum-Grzhimailo and Bartschat [22]. More recently, however, the semi-relativistic BSR mentioned above was very successful in describing the resonance structure in e-Ne and e-Ar scattering, both for angle-integrated [11,23,24] and angle-differential [25][26][27] cross sections. For e-Xe collisions, on the other hand, significant differences between theory and experiment remained [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show just one example, namely the excitation of the four lowest excited states in Ne from threshold to 20 eV, measured at the backward scattering angle 180 • with an energy width of 10 meV for the incident electron beam. In Figure 7 we compare the respective experimental cross sections (left side) with those of the B-spline R-matrix calculations (right panels) [18]. Amazing agreement is observed in both the absolute size and in the detailed resonance structure, which shows characteristic changes for the four final excited Ne(2p 5 3s) levels.…”
Section: Hartmut Hotop (University Of Kaiserslautern Germany) and Mic...mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…To begin with, figure 1 shows our results for the production of metastable neon atoms in the (2p 5 )3s [3/2] 2 and the (2p 5 )3s [1/2] 0 states by electron impact in the near-threshold regime. The sum of these two excitation cross sections has been used by Brunt et al [18,45] and Buckman et al [44] to analyse the details of the resonance structure (see also the review by Buckman and Clark [19]). After renormalizing the experimental data through dividing them by an overall factor of 1.29, and including the cascade contributions, we obtain essentially perfect agreement with the shape of the experimental data as a function of energy in the nearthreshold region, while we differ from Zeman and Bartschat [17] by nearly a factor of 2 in the predicted height of the first maximum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%