2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute configuration of (−)-myrtenal by vibrational circular dichroism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This functional has been used successfully when calculating some molecules possessing an aromatic ring, like epoxythymols and an aporphine alkaloid, for which the anharmonicity factor was always above the unit, specifically in the 1.002‐1.020 range. Anharmonicity factors above the unit are not exclusive for the PBEPBE functional, as a 1.007 value became evident when myrtenal was calculated at the B3PW91/DGTZVP level of theory . The VCD spectroscopic similarities for the correct enantiomer ( S E ) was 70.8, while that for the incorrect enantiomer ( S −E ) was 9.9.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This functional has been used successfully when calculating some molecules possessing an aromatic ring, like epoxythymols and an aporphine alkaloid, for which the anharmonicity factor was always above the unit, specifically in the 1.002‐1.020 range. Anharmonicity factors above the unit are not exclusive for the PBEPBE functional, as a 1.007 value became evident when myrtenal was calculated at the B3PW91/DGTZVP level of theory . The VCD spectroscopic similarities for the correct enantiomer ( S E ) was 70.8, while that for the incorrect enantiomer ( S −E ) was 9.9.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Anharmonicity factors above the unit are not exclusive for the PBEPBE functional, as a 1.007 value became evident when myrtenal was calculated at the B3PW91/DGTZVP level of theory. 44 The VCD spectroscopic similarities for the correct enantiomer (S E ) was 70.8, while that for the incorrect enantiomer (S −E ) was 9.9. The enantiomer similarity index (ESI), obtained by the S E − S −E difference was 60.8, and the data indicated a 100% confidence level (C) for the AC of (−)-(R)-podocephalyl acetate (2) and consequently its precursor is (+)-(7R)-podocephalol (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the latter data are normally scaled using an anharmonicity factor which was obtained using the commercial available confidence level algorithm software (BioTools Co., Jupiter, FL, 33458 USA) based on neighbourhood similarity 29 that we recently applied for the study of 1 R -(−)-myrtenal at several levels of theory. 30 This algorithm uses a correlation function that describes the integrated overlap of the experimental and theoretical data as a function of a relative vibrational frequency shift, being the optimal shift known as the anharmonicity ( anH ) factor. Taking advantage of this methodology, the calculated spectra of both diastereomers were compared in silico to the experimental IR and VCD spectra of 1 , the pertinent results being summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anharmonicity factors were calculated with the Compare VOA software package and used to scale frequency values of IR and VCD spectra. We have extensively used this program since 2010, through the courtesy of BioTools, and have always obtained valuable results over the years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%