2020
DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab8cce
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Magnitudes of Early-type Supergiants from uvbyβ Photometry and Parallax Data

Abstract: We combine Strömgren-Crawford uvbyβ photometry with Gaia-DR2 parallaxes for a sample of 880 supergiants of O-B9 spectral types to explore the potential of these data in providing physical parameters of such stars. We obtained reddening corrections and photometric absolute magnitudes via the existing uvbyβ calibrations. We calculated Gaia-based absolute magnitudes applying individual photometric reddening corrections for each star. The uvbyβ photometry is particularly useful in this case, since it provides colo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 7 we plot these values for the stars for which we derived luminosities either from the literature (Kudritzki et al 1999;Crowther et al 2006;Lefever et al 2007;Haucke et al 2018) or determined using absolute magnitudes from Kaltcheva et al (2020) and bolometric corrections of Crowther et al (2006). The observational values are plotted relative to the predicted massloss rate Ṁ and compared to predicted ionization fractions.…”
Section: Comparison With Observations and Other Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 7 we plot these values for the stars for which we derived luminosities either from the literature (Kudritzki et al 1999;Crowther et al 2006;Lefever et al 2007;Haucke et al 2018) or determined using absolute magnitudes from Kaltcheva et al (2020) and bolometric corrections of Crowther et al (2006). The observational values are plotted relative to the predicted massloss rate Ṁ and compared to predicted ionization fractions.…”
Section: Comparison With Observations and Other Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 7 we plot these values for the stars for which we derived luminosities either from the literature (Kudritzki et al 1999;Crowther et al 2006;Lefever et al 2007;Haucke et al 2018) or determined using absolute magnitudes from Kaltcheva et al (2020) and bolometric corrections of Crowther et al (2006). The observational values are plotted relative to the predicted mass-loss rate Ṁ and compared to predicted ionization fractions.…”
Section: Comparison With Observations and Other Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%