1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.5.3550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Measurement of the Far-Infrared Surface Resistance of Pb

Abstract: This rpport was prepared as an account of .work sponsored by the United States Government. Neither the United States nor the United States Atomic Energy Commission, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subc6ntractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, exphss or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[33,[79][80][81] At frequencies much higher than the Debye frequency (∼ 0.01 eV), the interaction averages over all the phonon modes resulting in a constant effective collision time with negligible frequency dependence. [82,83] The contribution from electron-electron scattering has been derived as [33,84] …”
Section: Comparison Of Drude Parameters With Literature Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33,[79][80][81] At frequencies much higher than the Debye frequency (∼ 0.01 eV), the interaction averages over all the phonon modes resulting in a constant effective collision time with negligible frequency dependence. [82,83] The contribution from electron-electron scattering has been derived as [33,84] …”
Section: Comparison Of Drude Parameters With Literature Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the spatial dispersion model, we obtained a value for the excess conduction loss factor of sd . [14] . Table 4 is comparison of Brandli's experiment data and three models predictions excess conduction loss factor for gold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…other sources [10][11] . The results for silver, gold and aluminium are shown in Table 2-Table 5, including the results from the classical skin-effect model and the classical relaxation-effect model [11,14] Parameter Metal Table 2 shows excess conduction loss factor for silver below sub-millimeter wavelengths range (32 m 26 m ). An extracted measurement value of surface resistance was given by Bennett et al [13] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is generally attributed to increasing sensitivity to enhanced electron scattering from surface microroughness 41,150,151 as the skin depths become smaller than one micron, ␦ Ͻ 1 m. In the THz regime, however, there are only sparse experimental data attempting to measure the pure material intrinsic rf conductivity and the results are in significant disagreement. [152][153][154][155] For example, the question of whether the intrinsic conductivity is anomalously smaller than or simply equivalent to the classical value at THz frequencies is a topic of current controversy, with experimental and theoretical data and arguments supporting both views. [152][153][154][155][156][157][158][159] There have been attempts to develop analytic theories for the intrinsic surface resistance, but they all necessarily make simplifying assumptions.…”
Section: Summary and Remaining Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%