2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute parameters of young stars: QZ Carinae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our best-fit solution, the star's evolutionary stage seems to be somewhere between Siess et al (2000)'s ZAMS and early-main sequence 6 . Its age of 9.7 Myr is probably in fair agreement with QZ Car age estimates (Walker et al 2017). The best-fit ATLAS9 model is displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Spectral Modelling Of Adsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…According to our best-fit solution, the star's evolutionary stage seems to be somewhere between Siess et al (2000)'s ZAMS and early-main sequence 6 . Its age of 9.7 Myr is probably in fair agreement with QZ Car age estimates (Walker et al 2017). The best-fit ATLAS9 model is displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Spectral Modelling Of Adsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We obtain the best agreement for a 2.2 M star with T eff = 9700 K, L = 25.5 L and R = 1.77 R , corresponding to a spectral type A0. According to Siess et al (2000) evolutionary tracks, its estimated age is 7.7 Myr, in fair agreement with the estimates for QZ Car (Walker et al, 2017).…”
Section: Qz Carsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…References. (1)Surkova & Svechnikov (2004), (2) Budding et al (2015), (3) Budding et al (2004), (4) Hilditch et al (2007), (5) Bell et al (1987), (6) Terrell et al (2005), (7) Surina & Kang (2009), (8) Stickland et al (1998), (9) Mahy et al (2011), (10) Evans (1974), (11) Tüysüz et al (2014), (12) Ibanoglu et al (2013), (13) Martins et al (2017), (14)Bagnuolo et al (1994), (15)Lorenz et al (1994), (16)Djurašević et al (2009), (17)Walker et al (2017), (18)Çakırlı (2015), (19)Rauw et al (1999), (20)Daems & Waelkens (1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%