1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01426883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute partial and total electron impact ionization cross sections for C3H8 from threshold up to 950 eV

Abstract: Abstract. Electron impact ionization of propane (C3H8) was studied using the ion beam deflection technique and a double focussing mass spectrometer in conjunction with a recently developed correction procedure that accounts for discrimination due to the initial kinetic energy of fragment ions. The relative corrected partial ionization cross sections for the production of C3H~-, C3 H+, C3HJ , C3Hff, C3H {, C3H3 ~, C3H +, C3 H+, C~-; C2H if, Call2, C2 H [ , C2H + , C2 H+ , C~' C H + , CH +, CH + , C +. c ~ H2+, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 is in good agreement with the experimental data by Durić et al 38 and by Grill et al 41 but somewhat lower than those by Schram et al 37 In Fig. 15, the BEB cross section is compared to the experimental data for C 6 H 6 by Schram et al, 37 which are available only for Tу600 eV.…”
Section: Hydrocarbonssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…14 is in good agreement with the experimental data by Durić et al 38 and by Grill et al 41 but somewhat lower than those by Schram et al 37 In Fig. 15, the BEB cross section is compared to the experimental data for C 6 H 6 by Schram et al, 37 which are available only for Tу600 eV.…”
Section: Hydrocarbonssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This deviation exceeds the reported experimental uncertainties, which were between 10% and 15% for all experimental data. On the contrary, the cross section data of Grill et al [24] are systematically lower than those of Durić et al (up to 65% below 30 eV), although the discrepancy above 30 eV (approximately 10%) can be considered negligible within the overall uncertainty. Grill et al determined partial ionization cross sections by measuring the number of positively charged molecular fragments, produced by the passage of an electron beam, by means of a mass spectrometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Durić et al [21] C H 4 , C 3 H 8 12-240 Grill et al [24] C H 4 15-950 Nishimura et al [23] C H 4 , C 3 H 8 15-3000 Schram et al [22] C H 4 , C 3 H 8 600-12 000 Theoretical De Souza et al [25] C H 4 2-500 Vinodkumar et al [26] C H 4 15-2000 Models BEB model [19] (see Appendix A) Chouki model [27] (see Appendix B) Table I). Error bars are only shown for selected data points to improve readability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Infrared assignments for non-crosslinked polybutadiene are as follows: 25,39 CH=CH 2 stretch (3010 cm In all cases, the AFM RMS surface roughness was measured to be less than 17 nm, which confirms the low level of plasmachemical roughening/texturing within the selected downstream plasma glow region due to the lack of surface bombardment by energetic electrical discharge species (e.g. ions), 28,29 Picolitre water droplet impact onto all of these surfaces displayed an initial spreading of the contact line to reach a maximum diameter. In the case of CF 4 plasma fluorinated polybutadiene, this was followed by dissipation of excess surface free energy observed as oscillations of the droplet height (stemming from lower energy dissipation during spreading across a more hydrophobic surface), whilst motion of the contact line was inhibited due to pinning, Figure 4(a).…”
Section: Non-crosslinked Versus Crosslinked Plasma Halogenated Polybumentioning
confidence: 71%