2015
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0858-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolutely relative or relatively absolute: violations of value invariance in human decision making

Abstract: Making decisions based on relative rather than absolute information processing is tied to choice optimality via the accumulation of evidence differences and to canonical neural processing via accumulation of evidence ratios. These theoretical frameworks predict invariance of decision latencies to absolute intensities that maintain differences and ratios, respectively. While information about the absolute values of the choice alternatives is not necessary for choosing the best alternative, it may nevertheless h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

34
258
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
34
258
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to make easier comparisons with previous reports and similar studies, the effects of the IATP-R have been presented as percentage of change instead of absolute values. 20 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial that provides evidence of the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of IATP-R in seniors. Commonly, a training program is considered as feasible when the adherence rate is >75%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to make easier comparisons with previous reports and similar studies, the effects of the IATP-R have been presented as percentage of change instead of absolute values. 20 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial that provides evidence of the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of IATP-R in seniors. Commonly, a training program is considered as feasible when the adherence rate is >75%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These findings resulted from an interim analysis leading to premature discontinuation of the study. In order to make easier comparisons with previous reports and similar studies, the effects of the IATP‐R have been presented as percentage of change instead of absolute values …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further to this, we also demonstrate that an equal increase of 258 initial deficits accelerates the reduction of deficits in Section 9 in S1 Text. This is a 259 clear indication that the interneuronal inhibition model employed in the presented 260 paper is sensitive to input magnitudes, which has emerged to be a general feature of 261 both individual [9,47,48] and collective decision-making [30,[49][50][51]. We present more 262 details on magnitude-sensitivity of our interneuronal inhibition model in Section 1 in S1 263 Text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…stable limit cycles) not present in the type of 401 model studied by [7], which is based on cross-inhibition as inhibitory motif. The 402 cross-inhibition motif has been applied in a variety of studies of decision-making [4][5][6][7][8][9] 403 and may generally be considered as an approximation of the more realistic interneuronal 404 inhibition motif [7].…”
Section: /22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4B). Overall, the left item was more likely to be chosen the higher its value, but this while choice RTs were faster as the value of the left item increased (Hunt & Hayden, 2017;Hunt et al, 2012;Pirrone, Azab, Hayden, Stafford, & Marshall, 2017;Teodorescu, Moran, & Usher, 2016), this relationship between value and RT also decreased as the left item N1 decreased (b = 1109.79, t = 2.44, p = .015 Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Variability In Behavior and Choice-related Neural Activity Imentioning
confidence: 97%