Summary To evaluate metabolic control and safety parameters (hypoglycaemia frequency and nasal mucosa physiology), 31 insulin-dependent diabetic patients were treated with intranasal insulin at mealtimes for i month and with subcutaneous fast-acting insulin at meals for another month in an open, crossover randomized trial. During both treatment periods the patients were treated with intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime. Six of the patients were withdrawn from the study during intranasal insulin therapy due to metabolic dysregulation. Serum insulin concentrations increased more rapidly and decreased more quickly during intranasal as compared with subcutaneous insulin administration. Metabolic control deteriorated, as assessed by haemoglobin Aic concentrations, slightly but significantly after intranasal as compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy. The bioavailability of intranasally applied insulin was low, since intranasal insulin doses were approximately 20 times higher than subcutaneous doses. The frequency of hypoglycaemia was similar during intranasal and subcutaneous insulin therapy, and nasal mucosa physiology was unaffected after intranasal insulin. We conclude that due to low bioavailability and to a high rate of therapeutic failure, intranasal insulin treatment is not a realistic alternative to subcutaneous insulin injections at the present time. [Diabetologia (1995) The limitations of intensive insulin therapy are mainly due to the pharmacokinetic properties of subcutaneously injected insulin, resulting in an increased frequency of hypoglycaemia [2]. Whereas avoiding hypoglycaemia with intensive insulin therapy only seems possible by raising blood glucose levels, a more physiological insulin administration might potentially reduce blood glucose without increasing the frequency of hypoglycaemia [3]. In this context, intranasal insulin administration has gained considerable interest, since after intranasal application of insulin, plasma insulin concentrations increase more rapidly and return to basal levels more quickly than after subcutaneous insulin injections [4]. Furthermore, this "needle-free" way of administering insulin avoids the problems inherent in insulin injections.Clinical data on intranasal insulin therapy are relatively scarce, since previous investigations were either pharmacokinetic studies, carried out in healthy