1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02871864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption of radio waves during a solar eclipse

Abstract: In this paper, the results of our observations on Al-method ionospheric absorption of radio waves on 1.8 and 2-2 MHz during the solar eclipse of 16 February 1980 are presented. The absorption decreased by about 41% and 46 % of the normal value respectively at the above two frequencies at Ahmedabad following the maximum phase of the eclipse (about 77 ~ of full disc) with a delay of 18 minutes. The quantity At(f) which is a measure of J Nvdh is now examined for better clarity of the influence of the changes in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the current eclipse, our GCP lied totally in the partial eclipse zone at an angle of 34° with respect to the path of totality and a large area of the Indian subcontinent was covered for the present study. It is also noted that the path lied totally under the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) region and few reports exist in literature over the Indian subcontinent [ Patel et al , 1986; Vyas et al , 1997; De and Sarkar , 1997; Abraham et al , 1998; Patra et al , 2009]. It is also interesting to note that the transmitter latitude 8.38°N was located almost near to the equatorial ionization trough region while our receiver was placed at 23.75°N latitude, which was near to the equatorial ionization crest region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the current eclipse, our GCP lied totally in the partial eclipse zone at an angle of 34° with respect to the path of totality and a large area of the Indian subcontinent was covered for the present study. It is also noted that the path lied totally under the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) region and few reports exist in literature over the Indian subcontinent [ Patel et al , 1986; Vyas et al , 1997; De and Sarkar , 1997; Abraham et al , 1998; Patra et al , 2009]. It is also interesting to note that the transmitter latitude 8.38°N was located almost near to the equatorial ionization trough region while our receiver was placed at 23.75°N latitude, which was near to the equatorial ionization crest region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[ Dixit and Rao , 1980; Chandra et al , 2007]. Also, the influence of eclipses on the low‐latitude D‐region (i.e., over the equatorial anomaly region) is much less studied during ionospheric sunrise transition period [ Mechtly et al , 1969; Patel et al , 1986; Mendes da Costa et al , 1995; Clilverd et al , 2001]. A solar eclipse is similar to the onset of a short‐time night; therefore, the accompanying effects in both cases are normally expected to be similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the solar eclipse of 16 February 1980, the field strength (11.8 MHz) measurements for the Colombo-Ahmedabad path showed an increase of about 23 db above the normal value during the totality (Jani et al, 1982). Multifrequency absorption measurements at Ahmedabad showed decreases of 40-45% (Patel et al, 1986). Phase and field measurements at VLF (16 kHz, Rugby) and HF (10 MHz ATA, New Delhi) and the field strength at LF (164 kHz, Tashkent) were also made at Kavalur in India during this event (Dixit et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relationship between the occurrence rates of tweeks and the increase in the intensity of solar eclipse at both the stations seems to be linear. However, a nonlinear relationship between ionization and solar radiation in the lower ionosphere has also been suggested [ Patel et al , 1986; Guha et al , 2010].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%