2012
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000416157.28982.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract 73

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite flaps have broadly been used in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, there still remains challenging for us to have a comprehensive understanding of vascular supply which limits to locate the perforators, assess flap status and predict optimal division timing of pedicled flaps [15, 18]. Currently, various approaches used for flap design and use seem ineffective [19]. For example, few methods is satisfactory to easily, quickly and comfortably locate the perforators at both high resolution and depths; the evaluation of flap status and the time of flap division are often evaluated via convention and personal experience based on skin warmth, color, capillary refill and dermal bleeding, but these signs are subjective and have limited sensitivity and/or specificity [18, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite flaps have broadly been used in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery, there still remains challenging for us to have a comprehensive understanding of vascular supply which limits to locate the perforators, assess flap status and predict optimal division timing of pedicled flaps [15, 18]. Currently, various approaches used for flap design and use seem ineffective [19]. For example, few methods is satisfactory to easily, quickly and comfortably locate the perforators at both high resolution and depths; the evaluation of flap status and the time of flap division are often evaluated via convention and personal experience based on skin warmth, color, capillary refill and dermal bleeding, but these signs are subjective and have limited sensitivity and/or specificity [18, 20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%