Background: Ensuring the comfort of the patient during Percutaneous
Coronary Interventiıon (PCI) is one of the nursing care goals. During
procedure, the patient’s comfort level may vary depending on the
vascular access method. Studies examining comfort from a nursing
perspective in coronary interventions are very limited. Objective: This
study is a descriptive cros-sectional study to identify the general
comfort levels of the patients and to determine whether transradial or
transfemoral access method affects the comfort level in PCI. Methods:
The study was conducted on 200 volunteer patients in a private
university hospital in Istanbul between May 2018 and May 2019. General
Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ) was used in this study. In the evaluation of
the data, t-test as well as percentage, mean, standard deviation, row
mean descriptive statistical methods were used. Results: In this study,
46% of the participants were in the 40-59 age group, 47% were over 60
years old, 74% were male, 92% were married. Angiography was performed
in 67% of the patients from the radial artery and 33% from the femoral
artery. The average overall comfort score was found to be 3.03 ± 0.3.
The patients received the highest score from psychospiritual comfort
subscale and the lowest score from physical comfort subscale. The score
averages of physical, psychospiritual, environmental, general comfort of
the patients who underwent transradial PCI were statistically higher
than transfemoral (p<0.05). According to both access methods,
a significant difference was found between the mean scores of the levels
of relief and ease. Conclusions: As a result, the general comfort level
of the patients who underwent PCI was found above medium level. The
patients received the lowest score from physical comfort subscale. The
comfort level of the patients who underwent transradial method was found
to be higher than those transfemoral.