2016
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-10-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract P6-10-17: Rates of prophylactic surgeries among BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers: A single institution experience

Abstract: Background Women with identified BRCA1/2 mutation have a substantially increased risk of developing several types of cancer, mainly breast and ovarian, during their lifetime. Management options included close surveillance, chemoprevention and prophylactic surgeries. The aim of this study is to assess the rate of prophylactic surgeries among BRCA1/2 carriers counseled and screened at a single institution in the last 2 decades. Methods We retrospectively captured all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, BRCA1 carriers are not prioritized over BRCA2 carriers as for prophylactic BSO based on the higher risk of ovarian cancer (Finch et al 2014). We have shown along with others that the uptake of BPM and BSO are suboptimal in Ontario and in Canada (Metcalfe et al 2008;Raphael et al 2015). Thus, while identifying more women at very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer may result in interventions that reduce these risks, without further resource allocation, these women will face long delays in obtaining access to appropriate screening and preventive surgery.…”
Section: Study Limitations Strengths and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, BRCA1 carriers are not prioritized over BRCA2 carriers as for prophylactic BSO based on the higher risk of ovarian cancer (Finch et al 2014). We have shown along with others that the uptake of BPM and BSO are suboptimal in Ontario and in Canada (Metcalfe et al 2008;Raphael et al 2015). Thus, while identifying more women at very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer may result in interventions that reduce these risks, without further resource allocation, these women will face long delays in obtaining access to appropriate screening and preventive surgery.…”
Section: Study Limitations Strengths and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 77%