Abstract P6-12-02: Survival differences between patients with metastatic inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer

Abstract

Background: Very little is known about the survival of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and distant metastasis. Furthermore, the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of breast cancer does not recognize metastatic IBC as a distinct entity within stage IV. We hypothesized that the survival of patients with IBC and distant metastasis is worse than the survival of patients with stage-matched non-IBC. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 5314 consecutive patients with stage III or IV breast cancer (IBC or non-IBC) who were treated at our institution between 1986 and 2012. A total of 1079 patients presented with IBC (stage III: 861; stage IV: 218) and 4235 non-IBC (stage III: 2781; stage IV: 1454). We compared the time to distant metastasis from initial diagnosis, distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in stage-matched patients with IBC or non-IBC. Results: The median follow-up periods were 3.3 years for patients with stage III disease (range, 0-32.2 years) and 1.8 years for patients with stage IV disease (range, 0-19.9 years). The total number of recorded events (metastasis/death) was 1657 for stage III, while the numbers of deaths for stage III and IV were 1337 and 973, respectively. In patients with stage III, the time to distant metastasis was shorter in IBC than in non-IBC (median 1.3 vs. 1.7 years, P < .001). DMFS and OS were shorter in patients with stage III IBC than in those with stage III non-IBC (2.5 vs. 6.9 years, P < .001; and 4.7 vs. 8.9 years, P < .001; respectively). However, there was no significant difference in OS after development of distant metastasis between stage III IBC and non-IBC (median for both 1.3 years, P = .83). In multivariate analysis, the diagnosis of IBC remained significantly associated with mortality after adjusting for potential confounders. De novo stage IV IBC presented more frequently with multiple sites of metastasis than de novo stage IV non-IBC (P = .02). In patients with de novo stage IV disease, OS was shorter in IBC than in non-IBC (2.3 vs. 3.4 years, P = .004). In the multicovariate Cox model, while ethnicity, tumor grade, hormone receptor status and HER2 status, site of metastasis, number of sites of metastasis, and definitive breast surgery by 1 year were all significant factors in OS for stage IV breast cancer, the diagnosis of IBC conferred a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% confidence interval: 1.05 - 1.69) in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that IBC patients with metastasis at diagnosis have worse outcomes than stage-matched non-IBC patients. IBC patients presenting with de novo stage IV disease should be considered as a separate subcategory of stage IV in the tumor-node-metastasis classification because their clinical course and prognosis are different from those of patients with stage IV non-IBC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-12-02.

Lipocalin 2 promotes inflammatory breast cancer tumorigenesis and skin invasion

“…IBC disproportionately affects young and African American women [6,1]. IBC is associated with unique clinical and biological features and a distinctive pattern of recurrence with high incidence in central nervous system, lung, and liver as first site of relapse [7,8,4]. Even with multimodality treatment strategies, survival rates for women with IBC are far lower than for those with other types of breast carcinoma (non-IBC), with estimated 5-year overall survival rates limited to 40% versus 63% for non-IBC [6,7,9,8,4].…”

“…IBC is associated with unique clinical and biological features and a distinctive pattern of recurrence with high incidence in central nervous system, lung, and liver as first site of relapse [7,8,4]. Even with multimodality treatment strategies, survival rates for women with IBC are far lower than for those with other types of breast carcinoma (non-IBC), with estimated 5-year overall survival rates limited to 40% versus 63% for non-IBC [6,7,9,8,4]. These features underscore the critical need to better define the mechanisms that drive the aggressive behavior of IBC and to develop novel agents to improve the overall prognosis for women with IBC.…”