2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-007-9047-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract rationality in education: from Vygotsky to Brandom

Abstract: rationality has increasingly been a target of attack in contemporary educational research and practice and in its place practical reason and situated thinking have become a focus of interest. The argument here is that something is lost in this. In illustrating how we might think about the issue, this paper makes a response to the charge that as a result of his commitment to the 'Enlightenment project' Vygotsky holds abstract rationality as the pinnacle of thought. Against this it is argued that Vygotsky had a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Transparency in the nature and purposes of digital tools in the classroom would therefore seem a worthwhile aim. Since learners are not passive receivers of information (Daniels, 2005;Derry, 2008;Duke, Pearson, Strachan, & Billman, 2011), they actively engage with the activities, making personal connections between the task and other topics within and beyond the classroom while using digital tools in this engagement. Thus, building on the Vygotskian notion of the active, sense-making learner (Vygotsky, 1981), Claxton (2007) pointed out the importance of developing metacognitive awareness in learners to foster conscious and active learning.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transparency in the nature and purposes of digital tools in the classroom would therefore seem a worthwhile aim. Since learners are not passive receivers of information (Daniels, 2005;Derry, 2008;Duke, Pearson, Strachan, & Billman, 2011), they actively engage with the activities, making personal connections between the task and other topics within and beyond the classroom while using digital tools in this engagement. Thus, building on the Vygotskian notion of the active, sense-making learner (Vygotsky, 1981), Claxton (2007) pointed out the importance of developing metacognitive awareness in learners to foster conscious and active learning.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our main argument is that the researcher's or the teacher's observation of student comprehension alone is not enough. The analyses of the classroom observations, teacher narratives, and student interviews suggest that the key to observation of student comprehension lies in the integration of the students' active engagement and reflections (Daniels, 2005(Daniels, , 2008Derry, 2008;Duke et al, 2011;Vygotsky, 1981Vygotsky, , 1986, made visible partly by using digital tools in the classroom (Davies & Eynon, 2013). Some challenges highlighted by these findings are discussed below.…”
Section: Case 4 -Observing Student Reflection Through Digital Co-prodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A postulation of shared understanding would not make sense on an inferentialist picture, precisely because inferentialism rejects as impossible the independence of thought and its articulation in language. It is only on the basis of an intersubjective context that thinking could take place at all-a view in line with Vygotsky's ideas (Bakhurst 2011;Derry 2008Derry , 2013Sfard 2008).…”
Section: The Social-individual Dichotomy: Normsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Our example on Sam's pride and the happiness expressed by the hospital supervisor point to the possibility that emotions can be part of webs of reasons and actions (an emotion can be a reason for an action, but an action can also be the reason for an emotion). More generally, Derry (2008Derry ( , 2013 has argued that Brandom's ideas are compatible with Vygotsky's (which were also influenced by Hegel), which makes Brandom's inferentialism interesting to sociocultural researchers. At the same time, Brandom gives a careful account of concepts and concept use, which is not so common in sociocultural research with its focus on practice and activity (as observed by Guile and Young 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%