2010
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745-113.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and diversity patterns of terrestrial bryophyte species in secondary and planted montane forests in the northern portion of the Central Cordillera of Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…are respectively dominated by tall broadleaves and conifers with dense undergrowth vegetation, where a thick layer of litter is formed. Bryophyte growth might be inhibited by shading and litter leachates [58]–[61]. Forests within the altitude range of 2,760–3,060 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are respectively dominated by tall broadleaves and conifers with dense undergrowth vegetation, where a thick layer of litter is formed. Bryophyte growth might be inhibited by shading and litter leachates [58]–[61]. Forests within the altitude range of 2,760–3,060 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the type of land use contributes more than the environmental regions to create differences in species diversity, suggesting that this issue should be further considered when sampling bryophytes (cf. Newmaster et al ., ; Löhmus, Löhmus & Vellak, ; Corrales et al ., ). Although the importance of land use for bryophyte diversity is well known by bryologists, to our knowledge, there are no previous studies in the literature showing the relative importance of this factor over environmental variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, higher evaporation in forests with a lower canopy closure reduces humidity and thus decreases the number of bryophyte species (Corrales et al 2010). Consistently, partial harvesting of wood caused a significant decrease in bryophyte cover and richness (Man et al 2008;Caners et al 2010), while vascular understory vegetation was not affected (Man et al 2008).…”
Section: Pollution Impacts On Bryophytes: Possible Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 90%