2021
DOI: 10.1111/aab.12692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and phenology of two pest species, Cacoecimorpha pronubana and Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)

Abstract: Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hübner, [1799]) and Epiphyas postvittana (Walker, 1863) are economically important polyphagous pest species. The larvae of these moths affect a wide range of horticultural crops. We evaluated the seasonal abundance and population dynamics of these two species, hypothesising that both species of moth exhibit similar patterns in their seasonal abundance and respond to abiotic factors. The study was carried out on a wide range of protected ornamental crops grown on a total area of 1 ha at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it was not expressly an objective of this study to compare these two species of moth, as interspecific differences are not unexpected, and were demonstrated in a previous study (Zielonka, Harris, Pope, & Leather, 2021), we show here that transgenerational dietary changes may affect different species differently. We found that survivorship and pupal development time in LBAM were affected by larval parental diet (pretreatment), but not by larval offspring diet (treatment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…While it was not expressly an objective of this study to compare these two species of moth, as interspecific differences are not unexpected, and were demonstrated in a previous study (Zielonka, Harris, Pope, & Leather, 2021), we show here that transgenerational dietary changes may affect different species differently. We found that survivorship and pupal development time in LBAM were affected by larval parental diet (pretreatment), but not by larval offspring diet (treatment).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%