2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejar.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance, distribution, diversity and zoogeography of epipelagic copepods off the Egyptian Coast (Mediterranean Sea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3, S4 and S8). The large copepod C. helgolandicus is rare in inshore waters, with maximum abundance in the present study observed in offshore waters, as reported for the Irish Sea (Gowen et al 1999) and the Mediterranean Sea (Zakaria et al 2016).…”
Section: S20supporting
confidence: 80%
“…S3, S4 and S8). The large copepod C. helgolandicus is rare in inshore waters, with maximum abundance in the present study observed in offshore waters, as reported for the Irish Sea (Gowen et al 1999) and the Mediterranean Sea (Zakaria et al 2016).…”
Section: S20supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The shallow hard bottom and intertidal soft-bottom of the Polychaetes assemblages along the coast of Alexandria,, in the south-eastern side of the Mediterranean Sea (Levantine Sea), were examined to detect the annual cycle of Polychaetes assemblages and analyze the spatial-temporal patterns of variation in assemblages and the relevant factors related to Polychaetes distribution (Dorgham et al, 2014;Zakaria et al, 2016Zakaria et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, D. rigida and D. oculata differ from D. minuta in having different spinulose spines originating in the mandible and the forehead being truncated broadly in the dorsal view (Bradford-Grieve et al, 1999). D. oculata is also closely related to D. rigida, which inhabits the Egyptian coast of the Mediterranean (Zakaria et al, 2016), but it can easily be recognized by its large eye lenses (Björnberg, 1963) and differing morphological characters. D. oculata has large terminal spines of swimming legs, whereas in D. rigida, the terminal spines of the exopod are shorter than the last segments of the swimming legs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%