2008
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance exchange models of fish assemblages along the Hudson River Estuary Gradient, New York

Abstract: The spatially explicit abundance exchange model (AEM) was built for four fish species: winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus), Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia), eastern silvery minnow (Hybognathus regius), and striped bass (Morone saxatilis) along the Hudson River estuary gradient, New York. The fish and habitat data during 1974-1997 were used to develop and calibrate the AEM; and the fish data during 1998-2001 was used to validate the model. Preference indexes of fish species for dissolved oxyge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distribution of juvenile fish in estuarine and coastal areas has been addressed with diverse methodologies including: habitat suitability indices (Brown et al, 2000;Vinagre et al, 2006); statistical habitat suitability models using Generalized Linear Models (GLM) (Riou et al, 2001;Le Pape et al, 2003b;Le Pape et al, 2007;Nicolas et al, 2007;Whaley et al, 2007;Rochette et al, 2010;Vasconcelos et al, 2010), Generalized Additive Models (GAM) (Stoner et al, 2001;Kupschus, 2003;Francis et al, 2005;Florin et al, 2009;Zucchetta et al, 2010), regression trees (Fodrie and Mendoza, 2006;Francis et al, 2011;Froeschke and Froeschke, 2011), mixed approaches (Norcross et al, 1999;Cabral et al, 2007;Lauria et al, 2011) for assessing preferential habitat; as well as regression quantiles for assessing potential habitat (Eastwood et al, 2003;Martin et al, 2009). In parallel, dynamic modelling approaches, such as spatially explicit Abundance Exchange Models based on habitat preferences (Singkran and Bain, 2008) are more seldom applied. Habitat-preference models have shown to be useful tools to model fish species presence/absence and/or abundance in estuaries, given knowledge of the local environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distribution of juvenile fish in estuarine and coastal areas has been addressed with diverse methodologies including: habitat suitability indices (Brown et al, 2000;Vinagre et al, 2006); statistical habitat suitability models using Generalized Linear Models (GLM) (Riou et al, 2001;Le Pape et al, 2003b;Le Pape et al, 2007;Nicolas et al, 2007;Whaley et al, 2007;Rochette et al, 2010;Vasconcelos et al, 2010), Generalized Additive Models (GAM) (Stoner et al, 2001;Kupschus, 2003;Francis et al, 2005;Florin et al, 2009;Zucchetta et al, 2010), regression trees (Fodrie and Mendoza, 2006;Francis et al, 2011;Froeschke and Froeschke, 2011), mixed approaches (Norcross et al, 1999;Cabral et al, 2007;Lauria et al, 2011) for assessing preferential habitat; as well as regression quantiles for assessing potential habitat (Eastwood et al, 2003;Martin et al, 2009). In parallel, dynamic modelling approaches, such as spatially explicit Abundance Exchange Models based on habitat preferences (Singkran and Bain, 2008) are more seldom applied. Habitat-preference models have shown to be useful tools to model fish species presence/absence and/or abundance in estuaries, given knowledge of the local environmental conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%