2006
DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[19:airtic]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance indices: reliability testing is crucial - a field case of wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Villafuerte et al 1994;Ontiveros and Pleguezuelos 2000;Palomares 2001Palomares , 2003, this methodology is considered a controversial tool for evaluating the abundance or density of a species. Most critics of this approach cite variations in the detectability of animals over space and time as key problems (Thompson et al 1998;Anderson 2001;Marchandeau et al 2006), while others question its validity for density estimation (Engeman 2005). In our study, several factors should have contributed to the stability of rabbit detectability and the consistency of the observations: all censuses were carried out along the same 14.7-km transect; a small number of experienced observers performed the censuses; the censuses were made along firebreaks whose width was maintained over time; and the censuses were performed at dusk, when rabbit activity aboveground is least affected by environmental factors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Villafuerte et al 1994;Ontiveros and Pleguezuelos 2000;Palomares 2001Palomares , 2003, this methodology is considered a controversial tool for evaluating the abundance or density of a species. Most critics of this approach cite variations in the detectability of animals over space and time as key problems (Thompson et al 1998;Anderson 2001;Marchandeau et al 2006), while others question its validity for density estimation (Engeman 2005). In our study, several factors should have contributed to the stability of rabbit detectability and the consistency of the observations: all censuses were carried out along the same 14.7-km transect; a small number of experienced observers performed the censuses; the censuses were made along firebreaks whose width was maintained over time; and the censuses were performed at dusk, when rabbit activity aboveground is least affected by environmental factors .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the unit, enumeration methods [20] (collection of cadavers) are used quite rarely for mortality estimations since they can contribute to bias results and underestimate mortality numbers as a consequence of pre-emergence death (before litters' emerge from the nest) and predation [21].…”
Section: Estimation Of Density and Mortality In 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spotlight surveys were also utilized in many of the leporids studies and is also a reliable method (Ballinger and Morgan 2002;Caley and Morely 2002). Marchandeau et al (2006) and Barrio et al (2010) point out that rabbit behavior, depending upon weather and lunar phases impinge on the rabbit being above ground therefore, may play a big role in detectability and abundance estimates. The season and time of day may also be important to consider for the study because some rabbits are more active at dusk than they are at midnight (Barrio 2010;Ballinger and Morgan 2002) and detectability may impinge on when rabbits forage (Barrio et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper reviewed papers that came from a few European countries, but did not include all European countries.  Marchandeau et al (2006) points out that they completed their study under similar weather conditions and similar lunar phases. These factors may be important to consider for consistency in leporid studies.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation