2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-34136-9_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundances in the Galactic Bulge

Abstract: The metallicity distribution and abundance ratios of the Galactic bulge are reviewed. Issues raised by recent work of different groups, in particular the high metallicity end, the overabundance of α-elements in the bulge relative to the thick disc and the measurement of giants versus dwarfs, are discussed. Abundances in the old moderately metal-poor bulge globular clusters are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second constraint on the formation timescale of the bulge comes from the observed α-element enhancement (McWilliam & Rich 1994Barbuy et al 2006;Zoccali et al 2004Zoccali et al , 2006Lecureur et al 2007;Fulbright et al 2007), once this is interpreted as a result of the interplay of the fast delivery of iron-poor nucleosynthesis products of massive stars by SNII's, with the slow delivery of iron-rich products by SNIa's. Again, a star formation timescale of approximately 1 Gyr is generally derived from chemical evolution models, which typically assume a distribution of SNIa delay times from Greggio & Renzini (1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second constraint on the formation timescale of the bulge comes from the observed α-element enhancement (McWilliam & Rich 1994Barbuy et al 2006;Zoccali et al 2004Zoccali et al , 2006Lecureur et al 2007;Fulbright et al 2007), once this is interpreted as a result of the interplay of the fast delivery of iron-poor nucleosynthesis products of massive stars by SNII's, with the slow delivery of iron-rich products by SNIa's. Again, a star formation timescale of approximately 1 Gyr is generally derived from chemical evolution models, which typically assume a distribution of SNIa delay times from Greggio & Renzini (1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%