2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10342-020-01262-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundant artificial grasslands around forests increase the deer impact on forest vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We incorporated fragmentation and forest edge effects by calculating the forest size and forest edge circumference in which the monitoring areas were located. Also, adapted from Takarabe and Iijima 2020 55 , we calculated the forest proportion in a 750 m radius around the center of each monitoring area and the distance of the center to the closest forest edge. To account for local terrain or relief effects, we first determined the elevation with a 38.2 m resolution at a 0° latitude, using the R-Package elevatr 56 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We incorporated fragmentation and forest edge effects by calculating the forest size and forest edge circumference in which the monitoring areas were located. Also, adapted from Takarabe and Iijima 2020 55 , we calculated the forest proportion in a 750 m radius around the center of each monitoring area and the distance of the center to the closest forest edge. To account for local terrain or relief effects, we first determined the elevation with a 38.2 m resolution at a 0° latitude, using the R-Package elevatr 56 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As roe deer populations become more abundant, the overall browsing pressure in forest systems increases (Borowski, Gil, et al, 2021 ; Hothorn & Müller, 2010 ; Tremblay et al, 2007 ). However, where and how intensely the browsing occurs is influenced by factors such as forest structure (Kupferschmid et al, 2020 ), predation pressure (Kuijper et al, 2013 ), anthropogenic disturbance (Borowski, Bartoń, et al, 2021 ; Gerhardt et al, 2013 ; Möst et al, 2015 ) and surrounding land‐use (Takarabe & Iijima, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many plants are potentially palatable for red deer as they are intermediate feeders, meaning that they are able to switch between browsing on woody items and grazing on herbaceous vegetation (Clauss et al., 2010; Hofmann, 1989). Moreover, the level of bark stripping can also be positively related to the proportion of agricultural land in the surrounding landscape (Jarnemo et al., 2014), suggesting that landscape structure and/or land use may be important additional factors that should be considered for an increased understanding of deer damage patterns (Kuijper, 2011; Putman et al., 2011; Takarabe & Iijima, 2020; Spake et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%