2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundant variation in microsatellites of the parasitic nematode Trichostrongylus tenuis and linkage to a tandem repeat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approximation s a accounts for 98.1% of the variation in s at n H ¼ 50 and .99.5% at n H $ 100. Although all microsatellite allele-frequency distributions will deviate from broken-stick expected frequencies to some extent, comparison of s calculated from data with s a simulated at the same H e and n H for data from 54 microsatellite loci (H e range, 0.27-0.90; n H range, 172-545) from aphids ( Johnson et al 2000), nematodes ( Johnson et al 2006), red foxes, and Ethiopian wolves (data kindly provided by P. Wandeler and D. A. Randall) suggests that the broken-stick model fits well to reality. The means of the simulated and real standard deviations were not significantly different (mean s a ¼ 0.0124, mean data s ¼ 0.0130, P ¼ 0.24, paired t-test), and the slope of the linear regression line (s ¼ 1.10s a À 0.0007, R 2 ¼ 0.62) did not differ significantly from 1 (t 52 ¼ 0.87, P ¼ 0.39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approximation s a accounts for 98.1% of the variation in s at n H ¼ 50 and .99.5% at n H $ 100. Although all microsatellite allele-frequency distributions will deviate from broken-stick expected frequencies to some extent, comparison of s calculated from data with s a simulated at the same H e and n H for data from 54 microsatellite loci (H e range, 0.27-0.90; n H range, 172-545) from aphids ( Johnson et al 2000), nematodes ( Johnson et al 2006), red foxes, and Ethiopian wolves (data kindly provided by P. Wandeler and D. A. Randall) suggests that the broken-stick model fits well to reality. The means of the simulated and real standard deviations were not significantly different (mean s a ¼ 0.0124, mean data s ¼ 0.0130, P ¼ 0.24, paired t-test), and the slope of the linear regression line (s ¼ 1.10s a À 0.0007, R 2 ¼ 0.62) did not differ significantly from 1 (t 52 ¼ 0.87, P ¼ 0.39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are reflected in the relatively high frequency of SSR transferability among legume species (Pandian et al, 2000;Gutierrez et al, 2005). The contradictory view that microsatellites are derived from repetitive (high copy number) sequences is supported by several reports in plants (Ramsay et al, 1999;Temnykh et al, 2001;Koike et al, 2006;Tero et al, 2006), insects (Wilder and Hollocher, 2001;Meglecz et al, 2007;Van't Hof et al, 2007) and nematodes (Johnson et al, 2006), suggesting a link between transposable elements and microsatellite sequence. One theory is that the transposable element harboring the proto-microsatellite sequence distributes it genome-wide by transposition and this sequence subsequently develops into a full microsatellite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Microsatellites have been described in parasitology and used in some parasites of both humans and animals (9). Microsatellites are abundant in eukaryotic genomes and can mutate rapidly by loss or gain of repeat units (81,85). The wide variety of applications of microsatellites is mainly because they show frequent polymorphism, codominant inheritance, high reproducibility and high resolution, require simple typing methods, and can be detected by PCR (84).…”
Section: Microsatellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low popularity of these genetic markers may be explained by the high number of microsatellites, which cause technical difficulties in isolating parasites by PCR (9,85).…”
Section: Microsatellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%