2016
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.16264abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abusive Supervision and Poor Creativity: The Social Cognitive and Social Comparison Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased interest in leadership behavior (e.g., Liu et al, 2012 ) emphasizes the need to further our understanding of why and how the behavior of managers such as abusive supervisors affects employees. The detrimental effects of abusive supervisors on employee creativity has been thoroughly explored (e.g., Jiang and Tang, 2016 ; Hussain and Sia, 2017 ). However, recent findings by Fiset et al ( 2019 ) have challenged the notion that inconsistent leadership behavior can not coincide with influencing employee perceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased interest in leadership behavior (e.g., Liu et al, 2012 ) emphasizes the need to further our understanding of why and how the behavior of managers such as abusive supervisors affects employees. The detrimental effects of abusive supervisors on employee creativity has been thoroughly explored (e.g., Jiang and Tang, 2016 ; Hussain and Sia, 2017 ). However, recent findings by Fiset et al ( 2019 ) have challenged the notion that inconsistent leadership behavior can not coincide with influencing employee perceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that mistreatment by management can harm employees more than abuse by colleagues or customers. Studies have shown that Chinese supervisors gain a sense of control through abusive behavior (Farh et al, 2007; Jiang et al, 2016; Mitchell et al, 2015). They feel that they can get more work out of their employees by using fear and intimidation.…”
Section: Implication Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%