2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3033049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AC Voltage Sensorless-Based Natural Frame Control of Cascaded H-Bridge Converter Based on Virtual Flux Observer

Abstract: In this study, a novel natural frame control method without AC voltage sensors is proposed for single-phase cascaded H-bridge (CHB) multilevel converter and implemented in the three-cell CHB converter platform. An improved virtual flux observer (VFO) is introduced to convert the estimated AC voltage signal into the virtual flux (VF) signal and then to vectorize it. The relationship between the instantaneous power and flux linkage is used to achieve independent control of the active and reactive currents. Compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the steady‐state experimental results and current harmonic content of other control methods in grid‐connected mode for the same distorted grid is given in Figure 16. Figure 16A–D shows the steady‐state waveforms in grid‐connected mode for method 1 in Yang et al, 21 the method without PLL in Yang et al 26 (noted as method 2), the improved NFC method in Yang et al 32 (noted as method 3), and the voltage‐sensorless NFC method in Shao et al 33 (noted as method 4), respectively. Figure 16 gives a comparison of the steady‐state experimental results of other methods in grid‐connected mode.…”
Section: Experimental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of the steady‐state experimental results and current harmonic content of other control methods in grid‐connected mode for the same distorted grid is given in Figure 16. Figure 16A–D shows the steady‐state waveforms in grid‐connected mode for method 1 in Yang et al, 21 the method without PLL in Yang et al 26 (noted as method 2), the improved NFC method in Yang et al 32 (noted as method 3), and the voltage‐sensorless NFC method in Shao et al 33 (noted as method 4), respectively. Figure 16 gives a comparison of the steady‐state experimental results of other methods in grid‐connected mode.…”
Section: Experimental Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid voltage estimation deviation, DC drift problem, and the difficulty in obtaining the fundamental grid voltage in the case of three-phase unbalance are respectively addressed in previous studies [23][24][25] to achieve grid voltage-sensorless control; however, they are based on complex observers that are not conducive to digital implementation. A direct current control method without PLL based on an improved virtual flux observer have been performed in Yang et al, 26 but the method does not validate the grid distortion condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existing sensorless control methods have drawbacks, as follows. Firstly, the existing sensorless control methods are mainly based on ideal grid conditions without considering the distorted grid conditions [27][28][29]. The grid voltage is easily distorted because of the increase of nonlinear loads and distributed generators [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%