2009
DOI: 10.1080/13614530903069307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Digital Libraries of the Future: An Environment Scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bradwell's (2009) vision is exciting as libraries strive to become edgeless within their own campuses, providing spaces for learning, sharing and gathering. Academic literacy will continue to evolve in a digital world and HE libraries need to consider how to market Law's (2009) “trusted brand” via mobile technology. The concept of the library has proved remarkably resilient over time, but there is no room for complacency as experience has shown that stakeholders and suppliers will vote with their feet if the library “brand” is not perceived as relevant and accessible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradwell's (2009) vision is exciting as libraries strive to become edgeless within their own campuses, providing spaces for learning, sharing and gathering. Academic literacy will continue to evolve in a digital world and HE libraries need to consider how to market Law's (2009) “trusted brand” via mobile technology. The concept of the library has proved remarkably resilient over time, but there is no room for complacency as experience has shown that stakeholders and suppliers will vote with their feet if the library “brand” is not perceived as relevant and accessible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mandate arises at a time when academic libraries are challenged to find a unique niche amid a rapidly changing environment in which us-ers are changing, content is changing, higher education is changing, and research is taking new forms (Law, 2009). In contrast, despite the incremental growth in digital content in recent years, libraries' responses have been rather timid and oftentimes ineffectual.…”
Section: Concluding Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Libraries have tended to focus on commercially available materials, especially journals, necessitating considerable amounts of time and energy devoted to licensing and consortial negotiations, which are not basically different from the ones that publishers offer to consortia in other countries. Secondly, libraries have digitized quantities of the paper collections already owned (Law, 2009), creating "cabinets of curiosity" that rarely offer added value. Heritage museums and research archives also struggle to remain relevant today, as "relevance" is increasingly challenged by the omnipresence of Web 2.0 social networking and knowledge production technologies (Wawrzaszek & Wedaman, 2008).…”
Section: Concluding Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are those who focus on the universal and enduring appeal of the library as a learning space (Watson 2010), whilst others argue that the advent of digital information means we are operating in a totally new paradigm, and that space is now of low priority. Therefore, academic libraries should instead focus on more important aspects such as university-wide information management policies, and building strong relationships with faculties (Law 2009a). Whilst there does not seem to be a strong consensus on this debate, the fact that it is being debated at all demonstrates the increased importance of this issue in library and information science (see JISC 2009).…”
Section: Onwardsmentioning
confidence: 99%