2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic discourse as situated practice: An introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatedly, further study of the link between students’ thinking and access to disciplinary linguistic and semiotic resources could also prove fruitful. These questions might be informed by current literature on disciplinary language and literacy (Fang & Schleppegrell, ; Heller & Morek, ; Moje, ; Shanahan & Shanahan, ) as well as that on multimodality in STEM pedagogy (Jewitt, Kress, Ogborn, & Tsatsarelis, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatedly, further study of the link between students’ thinking and access to disciplinary linguistic and semiotic resources could also prove fruitful. These questions might be informed by current literature on disciplinary language and literacy (Fang & Schleppegrell, ; Heller & Morek, ; Moje, ; Shanahan & Shanahan, ) as well as that on multimodality in STEM pedagogy (Jewitt, Kress, Ogborn, & Tsatsarelis, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings call for taking into account not only the communicative role of language, but also its epistemic role in the processes of knowledge construction as a medium of thinking (Heller & Morek, 2015;. Students with low language proficiency might not only be hindered by reading obstacles (communicative role) in showing their competencies in tests but also be constrained throughout their individual school history, especially with respect to developing conceptual understanding (Prediger et al, 2015a;.…”
Section: Language Gaps In Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Devmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguists have described the general differences between everyday language and school academic language in the lexical dimension (e.g., by specialized vocabulary, composite or unfamiliar words, and specific connectors) and in the syntactical dimension (e.g., long and syntactically complex sentences, passive voice constructions, and long noun phrases and prepositional phrases). Beyond the lexical and syntactic dimension, the school academic register can be characterized on the discursive dimension through specific discursive practices (e.g., arguing and explaining why), which are also not equally offered in all families (Bailey, 2007;Heller & Morek, 2015;Thürmann et al, 2010).…”
Section: Three Roles Of the School Academic Language For Conceptual Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings call for taking into account not only the communicative role of language, but also its epistemic role in the processes of knowledge construction as a medium of thinking (Heller & Morek, 2015;Vygotsky, 1978). Students with low language proficiency might not only be hindered by reading obstacles (communicative role) in showing their competencies in tests but also be constrained throughout their individual school history, especially with respect to developing conceptual understanding (Prediger et al, 2015a;Moschkovich, 2015).…”
Section: Language Gaps In Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Devmentioning
confidence: 99%