2016
DOI: 10.1080/87567555.2015.1133558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Dishonesty: Assessing the Threat of Cheating Companies to Online Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As software cannot adequately assist with detecting incidences of contract cheating, this is therefore left to faculty. However, studies such as Lines (2016) and Malesky et al (2016) have shown how these contract cheating services can both be undetected by faculty (despite knowledge of their use) whilst also providing acceptable grades for the students engaging in these practices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As software cannot adequately assist with detecting incidences of contract cheating, this is therefore left to faculty. However, studies such as Lines (2016) and Malesky et al (2016) have shown how these contract cheating services can both be undetected by faculty (despite knowledge of their use) whilst also providing acceptable grades for the students engaging in these practices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding may be related to Curtis and Popal (2011), who highlighted that the students with higher grades plagiarized less than students with lower grades. However, a good academic standing is not always the result of ethically compliant output from students (Lines, 2016;Malesky et al, 2016). This may enlighten TEIs and teacher educators to screen the outputs of the PSTs for possible acts of plagiarism, whether they made it with or without awareness of its consequences.…”
Section: Correlation Between the Psts Awareness On Plagiarism And Aca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, faculty reactions to cheating may not necessarily be in line with the university"s institutional policy although they are aware of the required steps. Different safeguards are used to protect the integrity of their courses, but there is an apparent lack of knowledge about available safeguards and their use (Malesky, Baley & Crow, 2016).…”
Section: Faculty Perceptions Of Online Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Malesky, Baley and Crow (2016), faculty are often uncertain about the extent of cheating at their college. But, most take corrective action once they discover an instance of cheating has been reported (Larkin & Mintu-Wimsatt, 2015).…”
Section: Faculty Perceptions Of Online Cheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%