2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.816609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Engagement with Wadden Sea Stakeholders: A Review of Past Foci and Possible Futures

Abstract: The Wadden Sea became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2009 owing to its geographical and ecological importance. Given its status and its global recognition, academic understanding of, and engagement with, a diverse set of stakeholders is crucial to the sustainability of the Wadden Sea and the wildlife that inhabit its transnational boundaries. As such, this paper reviews with whom, how, and to what extent the academy has engaged with Wadden Sea stakeholders. This study finds that stakeholder groups (whom, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 76 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These key terms were chosen to reflect the focus on art-science collaborations and the ocean (see Table 1). For each paper found, the abstracts were read and those that were deemed relevant were filtered for further full reads (Gadsden et al, 2022). I excluded those articles which did not have any art-science collaboration element, any grey literature such as policy reports, pamphlets or websites and only reviewed articles written in the English language.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These key terms were chosen to reflect the focus on art-science collaborations and the ocean (see Table 1). For each paper found, the abstracts were read and those that were deemed relevant were filtered for further full reads (Gadsden et al, 2022). I excluded those articles which did not have any art-science collaboration element, any grey literature such as policy reports, pamphlets or websites and only reviewed articles written in the English language.…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%