Academic expectations among international students from North-Western China: A case of technology use during and post COVID-19

Abstract

This study examines the influence of the COVID-19 crisis on academic expectations among international students from north-western China. According to past studies, academic expectations are multifaceted, making it critical to test the methods employed to assess this fundamental trait. The outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in various significant changes in education, which have shifted from traditional to online or mixed formats. As a result, examining international students' academic expectations along with their interactions with adopted technologies is a topic that addresses the current situation and issues. A mixed approach, comprising two different instruments (questionnaire and interview), was followed to achieve this primary objective. While a survey with a questionnaire was undertaken with 551 international students, divided into two groups, ten students were interviewed during and after the lockdowns. The findings revealed that COVID-19 had a significant impact on the academic expectations of students as well as many elements such as training for employment, personal and social development, international student mobility, motivation, social pressure, and social interaction with the help of supporting technologies. In terms of gender, men outperformed women in motivation, social interaction, training for employment, and personal and social development factors. Similarly, as per the grade variable (undergraduate, postgraduate, doctoral), the same higher trend was seen in postgraduates. Based on these findings, a set of recommendations was put forward. In the future, technology will be helpful in China's educational sector, such as online group collaboration, open education, managing student retention, and supervising teachers' recruitment.

Measuring academic self-efficacy and learning outcomes: the mediating role of university English students' academic commitment

“…The current study was carried out to measure Yemeni University students' ASE, LOs and AC and investigate the relationships among all these variables. It is pointless to put significant effort into conducting a study if the conclusions are not somewhat valid and dependable, as efficacy assessments cannot be made with confidence in such a situation (AL-Qadri et al, 2022;Boudouaia et al, 2022). To that end, the researchers conducted several steps before the final questionnaire was administered to the sample of the study.…”

“…The final version of the learning outcomes scale components of 10 items is distributed on three factors: (Cognitive outcomes = 4 items; Social outcomes = 3 items; Self-growth outcomes = 3 items). Following fit indices to evaluate the overall goodness of fit of the model were indicated to good model when CFI = 0.909, TLI = 0.904, IFI = 0.910, GFI = 0.995, SRMR = 0.058, and RMSEA = 0.054 (AL-Qadri et al, 2022). Reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha based on the three-factor model for developing the Academic self-efficacy scale.…”

“…The final version of the AC scale components of 27 items was distributed on five factors: (Level of commitment = 5 items; Satisfaction=6 items; Quality of alternatives = 3 items; Investment = 5 items; Meaningfulness = 8 items). Following fit indices to evaluate the overall goodness of fit of the model were indicated to good model when CFI = 0.917, TLI = 0.889, IFI = 0.902, GFI = 0.911, SRMR = 0.060, and RMSEA = 0.062 (AL-Qadri et al, 2022;Heale & Twycross, 2015). Cronbach's alpha has been calculated based on the five-factor model for developing the ASE scale.…”

A Case Study of Factors That Affect Secondary School Mathematics Achievement: Teacher-Parent Support, Stress Levels, and Students’ Well-Being

“…Furthermore, Hair et al [ 66 ] stated that questionnaire items are good estimators when the outer loading is greater than 0.5. Then, the HTMT value was tested to determine the correlation between constructs and analyze discriminant validity [ 69 ]. Previous studies suggested the HTMT value should not be higher than 0.9, with better performance at less than 0.85.…”

Key Factors Affecting Mathematics Teachers’ Well-Being and Stress Levels: An Extended Engagement Theory

“…Previous studies extensively analyzed teachers' stress, which directly affects teaching and learning activities [25,49,82]. It was observed that stress affects teachers' physical and mental health [83,84]. Excessive stressful conditions can also cause teachers' depression and reduce teaching performance, which interferes with sustainable education.…”