2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Library Consortium in Jordan: An Evaluation Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the increase of the number of educational institutions in Jordan, educational standards that are associated with academic libraries became a priority in an effort to organize services such as collection development, technical and user services. These services are needed to be compatible with the goals and standards of the Jordanian higher education system (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of the number of educational institutions in Jordan, educational standards that are associated with academic libraries became a priority in an effort to organize services such as collection development, technical and user services. These services are needed to be compatible with the goals and standards of the Jordanian higher education system (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libraries form consortia for various reasons. Among them are to improve the resources available in local, national or international libraries (Perushek and Douglas, 2014), whether these are financial (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013; Al-Baridi, 2016; Jurczyk and Jacobs, 2014) or technological (Blobaum, 2014), or aiming for synergy among participants, collaboration, scale economies, sharing information and knowledge, increasing brand value, broadening perspectives, team enablement and technical support (Chiwanza and Mutongi, 2018; Jeon and Menicucci, 2017; Wakeling et al, 2018), Therefore, consortia allow resource-sharing to increase capacities to satisfy their users’ information needs (Bhatt, 2013; Maceviciute et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors claim subscribing to individual resources can be more advantageous for the consortium as the collection can be centred on the user rather than in the publisher’s interest (Pedersen et al, 2014). This form of contract can be detrimental to the consortium, as in the case of a group of libraries with homogeneous interests, they will not benefit from the diversity of titles supplied (Ahmed and Suleiman, 2013; Armstrong and Teper, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problems of the articles are connected with the study of the problems of development of business models of access to open content [ 17 , 18 ] and legal issues governing the open science movement; organization of user service; indexing in databases and publishing systems; distribution, search and access; payment for articles [ 19 ]; generation and use of open access repositories [ 20 ]; research data management and the role of librarians as collaborators and digital curators [ 21 , 22 ]; etc. The results of the bibliometric analysis of the document flow indicate a steady increase in publications on the topic considered here, the dominance of the number of publications in journals (the rating is built by their number in publications in library and information sciences), which confirms the relevance and need for a comprehensive study of the role of libraries in the development of open science.…”
Section: A Conceptual Framework For the Role Of The Scientific Librar...mentioning
confidence: 99%