2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73204-6_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Performance Assessment Based on Accumulative Rating System at Polytechnic University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, α = 0.5 and λ = 0.5 indicated that the uncertainty of the environment does not fluctuate during decision making. Nine judgment matrices were aggregated by using Equation (13). The representative group fuzzy judgment matrix is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, α = 0.5 and λ = 0.5 indicated that the uncertainty of the environment does not fluctuate during decision making. Nine judgment matrices were aggregated by using Equation (13). The representative group fuzzy judgment matrix is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most teachers found the argument scoring tool helpful in their practice, but they had some difficulties in understanding it, so the method of assessing student performance should be easy to understand. Gulk [13] used the cumulative scoring system to evaluate students' teaching achievements in social and art disciplines. Unlike the traditional method of evaluating student performance by final exams, the cumulative scoring system introduced continuous monitoring and a rating-based accumulation system, observed the whole process and scored, and used weighting factors to correct the learning process in time, filling the gap of learning process monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%