Academic Productivity of Directors of ACGME-Accredited Residency Programs in Surgery and Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background Scholarly activity is expected of program directors of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited residency training programs. Anesthesiology residency programs are cited more often than surgical programs for deficiencies in academic productivity. We hypothesized that this may in part reflect differences in scholarly activity between program directors of anesthesiology and surgical trainings programs. To test the hypothesis, we examined the career track record of current program directors of ACGME-accredited anesthesiology and surgical residency programs at the same institutions using PubMed citations and funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as metrics of scholarly activity. Methods Between November 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011, we obtained data from publicly available websites on program directors at 127 institutions that had ACGME-accredited programs in both anesthesiology and surgery. Information gathered on each individual included year of board certification, year first appointed program director, academic rank, history of NIH grant funding, and number of PubMed citations. We also calculated the h-index for a randomly selected subset of 25 institution-matched program directors. Results There were no differences between the groups in number of years since board certification (P = 0.42), academic rank (P = 0.38), or years as a program director (P = 0.22). However, program directors in anesthesiology had less prior or current NIH funding (P = 0.002), fewer total and education-related PubMed citations (both P < 0.001), and a lower h-index (P = 0.001) than surgery program directors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the publication rate for anesthesiology program directors was 43% (95% CI 0.31–0.58) that of the corresponding program directors of surgical residency programs, holding other variables constant. Conclusions Program directors of anesthesiology residency programs have considerably less scholarly activity in terms of peer-reviewed publications and federal research funding than directors of surgical residency programs. As such, this study provides further evidence for a systemic weakness in the scholarly fabric of academic anesthesiology.

Do Standard Bibliometric Measures Correlate with Academic Rank of Full‐Time Pediatric Dentistry Faculty Members?

“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A key difference among studies is the variability of the h-index between specialties, in some cases reflecting underlying differences in academic promotion between departments or schools. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A key difference among studies is the variability of the h-index between specialties, in some cases reflecting underlying differences in academic promotion between departments or schools.…”

“…The h-index has been extensively studied in medicine and dentistry, with most studies demonstrating a strong correlation between the h-index and academic rank. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] A key difference among studies is the variability of the h-index between specialties, in some cases reflecting underlying differences in academic promotion between departments or schools. Nonetheless, the h-index remains the most extensively studied tool for assessing academic productivity.…”

Perspectives of anesthesia residents training in Canada on fellowship training, research, and future practice location

“…5 Thus, residents interested in incorporating research or a fellowship into their career may have a competitive advantage in hiring processes at academic institutions. 5,24,25 The four most popular anesthesia subspecialties were regional anesthesia, intensive care, cardiac anesthesia, and acute or chronic pain. The popularity of regional anesthesia may be to increase skill in performing regional blocks, as many U.S. anesthesia residents finish their residency training and are still not confident in performing certain regional block techniques.…”

Academic productivity of faculty associated with microsurgery fellowships

“…Among all plastic surgeons, an h‐index of 7 (range 0–62) has been reported, while a study of hand surgeons revealed a comparable mean h‐index of 10.2 (Gast et al, ; Lopez et al, ). Studies of other surgical fields have also yielded similar results: orthopedic surgeons, h‐index 11 (IQR 15); hepatic surgeons, h‐index 6 (IQR 10); and general surgeons, h‐index 11 (IQR 15) (Cucchetti et al, ; Culley et al, ; Stavrakis et al, ).…”